WRIGHT, Michelle, Takuya YANAGIDA, Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ, Ikuko AOYAMA, Lenka DĚDKOVÁ, Hana MACHÁČKOVÁ, Zheng LI, Shanmukh V. KAMBLE, Fatih BAYRAKTAR, Shruti SOUDI, Li LEI and Chang SHU. Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries. International Journal of Developmental Science. 2016, vol. 10, 1-2, p. 43-53. ISSN 2192-001X. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/DEV-150179.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries
Name in Czech Differences in Coping Strategies for Public and Private Face-to-Face and Cyber Victimization among Adolescents in Six Countries
Authors WRIGHT, Michelle (840 United States of America, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Takuya YANAGIDA (56 Belgium), Anna ŠEVČÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Ikuko AOYAMA (56 Belgium), Lenka DĚDKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Hana MACHÁČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Zheng LI (56 Belgium), Shanmukh V. KAMBLE (56 Belgium), Fatih BAYRAKTAR (196 Cyprus, belonging to the institution), Shruti SOUDI (56 Belgium), Li LEI (56 Belgium) and Chang SHU (56 Belgium).
Edition International Journal of Developmental Science, 2016, 2192-001X.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50100 5.1 Psychology and cognitive sciences
Country of publisher Netherlands
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/16:00089947
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/DEV-150179
Keywords in English cyberbullying; online victimisation; coping strategies
Changed by Changed by: doc. Mgr. Anna Ševčíková, Ph.D., učo 319690. Changed: 21/7/2016 23:13.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the role of publicity (private versus public) and medium (face-to-face versus cyber) in adolescents’ coping strategies for hypothetical victimization, while also considering culture. Participants were adolescents from China, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, India, Japan, and the United States. The study also controlled for adolescents’ gender, individualism, and collectivism. Adolescents completed questionnaires on the hypothetical coping strategies that they would use for four scenarios, including public face-to-face victimization, public cyber victimization, private face-to-face victimization, and private cyber victimization. Overall, the findings revealed that adolescents relied more on avoidance, social support, retaliation, helplessness, and ignoring for public and face-to-face forms of victimization than for private and cyber forms of victimization. Cross-cultural differences in coping strategies are discussed.
PrintDisplayed: 28/7/2024 08:37