| BRACK, Werner, Selim AIT-AISSA, Robert M. BURGESS, Wibke BUSCH, Nicolas CREUSOT, Carolina DI PAOLO, Beate I. ESCHER, L. Mark HEWITT, Klára HILSCHEROVÁ, Juliane HOLLENDER, Henner HOLLERT, Willem JONKER, Jeroen KOOL, Marja LAMOREE, Matthias MUSCHKET, Steffen NEUMANN, Pawel ROSTKOWSKI, Christoph RUTTKIES, Jennifer SCHOLLEE, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Tobias SCHULZE, Thomas-Benjamin SEILER, Andrew J. TINDALL, Gisela De Aragao UMBUZEIRO, Branislav VRANA a Martin KRAUSS. Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments - An in-depth overview. Online. Science of the Total Environment. AMSTERDAM: Elsevier, 2016, roč. 544, February, s. 1073-1118. ISSN 0048-9697. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.102. [citováno 2024-04-23] |
Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1345760,
author = {Brack, Werner and AitandAissa, Selim and Burgess, Robert M. and Busch, Wibke and Creusot, Nicolas and Di Paolo, Carolina and Escher, Beate I. and Hewitt, L. Mark and Hilscherová, Klára and Hollender, Juliane and Hollert, Henner and Jonker, Willem and Kool, Jeroen and Lamoree, Marja and Muschket, Matthias and Neumann, Steffen and Rostkowski, Pawel and Ruttkies, Christoph and Schollee, Jennifer and Schymanski, Emma L. and Schulze, Tobias and Seiler, ThomasandBenjamin and Tindall, Andrew J. and Umbuzeiro, Gisela De Aragao and Vrana, Branislav and Krauss, Martin},
article_location = {AMSTERDAM},
article_number = {February},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.102},
keywords = {Toxicant identification; Bioassay; Dosing; Enrichment; Fractionation; Non-target analysis},
language = {eng},
issn = {0048-9697},
journal = {Science of the Total Environment},
title = {Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments - An in-depth overview},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715310834},
volume = {544},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1345760
AU - Brack, Werner - Ait-Aissa, Selim - Burgess, Robert M. - Busch, Wibke - Creusot, Nicolas - Di Paolo, Carolina - Escher, Beate I. - Hewitt, L. Mark - Hilscherová, Klára - Hollender, Juliane - Hollert, Henner - Jonker, Willem - Kool, Jeroen - Lamoree, Marja - Muschket, Matthias - Neumann, Steffen - Rostkowski, Pawel - Ruttkies, Christoph - Schollee, Jennifer - Schymanski, Emma L. - Schulze, Tobias - Seiler, Thomas-Benjamin - Tindall, Andrew J. - Umbuzeiro, Gisela De Aragao - Vrana, Branislav - Krauss, Martin
PY - 2016
TI - Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments - An in-depth overview
JF - Science of the Total Environment
VL - 544
IS - February
SP - 1073-1118
EP - 1073-1118
PB - Elsevier
SN - 00489697
KW - Toxicant identification
KW - Bioassay
KW - Dosing
KW - Enrichment
KW - Fractionation
KW - Non-target analysis
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715310834
L2 - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715310834
N2 - Aquatic environments are often contaminated with complex mixtures of chemicals that may pose a risk to ecosystems and human health. This contamination cannot be addressed with target analysis alone but tools are required to reduce this complexity and identify those chemicals that might cause adverse effects. Effect-directed analysis (EDA) is designed to meet this challenge and faces increasing interest in water and sediment quality monitoring. Thus, the present paper summarizes current experience with the EDA approach and the tools required, and provides practical advice on their application. The paper highlights the need for proper problem formulation and gives general advice for study design. As the EDA approach is directed by toxicity, basic principles for the selection of bioassays are given as well as a comprehensive compilation of appropriate assays, including their strengths and weaknesses. A specific focus is given to strategies for sampling, extraction and bioassay dosing since they strongly impact prioritization of toxicants in EDA. Reduction of sample complexity mainly relies on fractionation procedures, which are discussed in this paper, including quality assurance and quality control. Automated combinations of fractionation, biotesting and chemical analysis using so-called hyphenated tools can enhance the throughput and might reduce the risk of artifacts in laboratory work. The key to determining the chemical structures causing effects is analytical toxicant identification. The latest approaches, tools, software and databases for target-, suspect and non-target screening as well as unknown identification are discussed together with analytical and toxicological confirmation approaches. A better understanding of optimal use and combination of EDA tools will help to design efficient and successful toxicant identification studies in the context of quality monitoring in multiply stressed environments.
ER -
BRACK, Werner, Selim AIT-AISSA, Robert M. BURGESS, Wibke BUSCH, Nicolas CREUSOT, Carolina DI PAOLO, Beate I. ESCHER, L. Mark HEWITT, Klára HILSCHEROVÁ, Juliane HOLLENDER, Henner HOLLERT, Willem JONKER, Jeroen KOOL, Marja LAMOREE, Matthias MUSCHKET, Steffen NEUMANN, Pawel ROSTKOWSKI, Christoph RUTTKIES, Jennifer SCHOLLEE, Emma L. SCHYMANSKI, Tobias SCHULZE, Thomas-Benjamin SEILER, Andrew J. TINDALL, Gisela De Aragao UMBUZEIRO, Branislav VRANA a Martin KRAUSS. Effect-directed analysis supporting monitoring of aquatic environments - An in-depth overview. Online. \textit{Science of the Total Environment}. AMSTERDAM: Elsevier, 2016, roč.~544, February, s.~1073-1118. ISSN~0048-9697. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.102. [citováno 2024-04-23]
|
