GAJDOŠ, Adam a Ivana RAPOŠOVÁ. Culture wars over family matters: the three grammars of commonality in the plural and their interplay in the disputes over the Slovak „anti-liberal“ referendum. Online. In 12th Conference of the European Sociological Association 2015. Differences, Inequalities and Sociological Imagination. 2015, [citováno 2024-04-24]
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Culture wars over family matters: the three grammars of commonality in the plural and their interplay in the disputes over the Slovak „anti-liberal“ referendum
Autoři GAJDOŠ, Adam (703 Slovensko, garant, domácí) a Ivana RAPOŠOVÁ (203 Česká republika)
Vydání 12th Conference of the European Sociological Association 2015. Differences, Inequalities and Sociological Imagination, 2015.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Prezentace na konferencích
Obor 50000 5. Social Sciences
Stát vydavatele Německo
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14230/15:00090218
Organizační jednotka Fakulta sociálních studií
Klíčová slova anglicky pragmatic sociology; justification; LGBI rights; referendum; Slovakia
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam
Změnil Změnil: Mgr. Adam Gajdoš, učo 420075. Změněno: 22. 9. 2017 17:13.
Anotace
Based on an analysis of the recent Slovak referendum concerned with issues of “traditional family”, this paper explores the possibilities of finding common ground in public disputes involving disparate systems of moral evaluation. The February 2015 referendum, initiated by an alliance of conservative civic organizations with the intention to conserve the legal privileges currently enjoyed by the traditional heterosexual family model, gave rise to discussions rich in moral claims and resulted in a massive polarization of the Slovak society. Using the theoretical framework of pragmatic sociology (Thévenot), we examine how the different grammars of commonality in the plural and forms of engagement interplay in the heated public debates over conflicting notions of family and over the role the state in its regulation. Following closely the argumentation of the proponents as well as the opponents of the referendum, we examine how beliefs about intimate family life were translated into publicly justifiable claims aiming towards common good. The pragmatic perspective helps us shed light on the ways emotionally invested non-civil discourses enter the public domain and gain legitimacy. Drawing on the Slovak case, the paper elaborates on the mechanisms used by populist political agents to exploit democratic processes and on the counter-strategies available for a defense of inclusive concepts of civil rights and freedoms.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 24. 4. 2024 05:07