Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inbook{1359857,
author = {Kundt, Radek},
address = {Leiden Boston},
booktitle = {Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452},
editor = {Luther H. Martin; Wiebe, Donald},
keywords = {religious studies; cognitive science of religion; philosophy of science},
howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
language = {eng},
location = {Leiden Boston},
isbn = {978-90-04-31044-5},
pages = {256-259},
publisher = {Brill},
title = {A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?},
year = {2016}
}
TY - CHAP
ID - 1359857
AU - Kundt, Radek
PY - 2016
TI - A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion?
VL - Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5
PB - Brill
CY - Leiden Boston
SN - 9789004310445
KW - religious studies
KW - cognitive science of religion
KW - philosophy of science
N2 - In my response to Martin and Wiebe's academic confession, I try to show that there is a major inconsistency in their argument. This inconsistency resides within their partial and therefore biased application of universal unconscious mechanisms that constrain the human mind, where the application should have been complete. Their argument should have been directed at all sciences or at science in general in order for it to be sound, and not particularly at Religious Studies. This would result in the argument that any scientific discipline is a delusion, which is an outcome Martin and Wiebe do not hold, as they make science a sine qua non for their own argument.
ER -
KUNDT, Radek. A Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion? In Luther H. Martin; Wiebe, Donald. \textit{Conversations and Controversies in the Scientific Study of Religion: Collaborative and Co-Authored Essays by Luther H. Martin and Donald Wiebe}. Leiden Boston: Brill, 2016, p.~256-259. Suplements to Method and Theory in the Study of Religion sv. 5. ISBN~978-90-04-31044-5. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004310452.
|
