Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1359879, author = {Burrascano, Sabina and Chytrý, Milan and Kuemmerle, Tobias and Giarrizzo, Eleonora and Luyssaert, Sebastiaan and Sabatini, Francesco Maria and Blasi, Carlo}, article_number = {September}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005}, keywords = {Afforestation; Carbon management; Climate change mitigation; Common Agricultural Policy; Grassland biodiversity; Habitats Directive}, language = {eng}, issn = {0006-3207}, journal = {Biological Conservation}, title = {Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity}, url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320716303081}, volume = {201}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1359879 AU - Burrascano, Sabina - Chytrý, Milan - Kuemmerle, Tobias - Giarrizzo, Eleonora - Luyssaert, Sebastiaan - Sabatini, Francesco Maria - Blasi, Carlo PY - 2016 TI - Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity JF - Biological Conservation VL - 201 IS - September SP - 370-376 EP - 370-376 PB - Elsevier SN - 00063207 KW - Afforestation KW - Carbon management KW - Climate change mitigation KW - Common Agricultural Policy KW - Grassland biodiversity KW - Habitats Directive UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320716303081 N2 - The extension of forest area is a globally accepted tool to offset CO2 emissions from deforestation and the combustion of fossil fuels. The common assumption is that in addition to the perceived climate benefits increasing forest area will also support biodiversity, thus making afforestation a “win-win scenario”. Based on the existing scientific evidences, we show that joined climate and biodiversity benefits are strongly context-dependent and that the outcome of afforestation is often highly questionable. In Europe, grasslands managed at low intensity contribute substantially to biodiversity conservation and carbon storage. However, many of these grasslands have been lost due to abandonment and subsequent spontaneous succession towards woody vegetation, or due to land use intensification. Moreover, grasslands are the ecosystems most often deliberately afforested in the context of EU carbon-centered policies that may thus counteract biodiversity conservation programmes. By reviewing the main EU policies targeting forests and grasslands, we found a striking ambivalence between policies and funding schemes addressing grassland conservation on the one hand (e.g. Habitats Directive, green payments within the Common Agricultural Policy) and those supporting afforestation on the other (e.g. rural development funds). We suggest three measures towards a better harmonization of the European Union policies that target forest and grassland ecosystems: (1) promoting the alignment of the decisions taken across different policy sectors; (2) focusing on the whole range of ecosystem services and biodiversity issues rather than on carbon management only; (3) valuing systems managed at low-intensity for their multifunctionality. ER -
BURRASCANO, Sabina, Milan CHYTRÝ, Tobias KUEMMERLE, Eleonora GIARRIZZO, Sebastiaan LUYSSAERT, Francesco Maria SABATINI and Carlo BLASI. Current European policies are unlikely to jointly foster carbon sequestration and protect biodiversity. \textit{Biological Conservation}. Elsevier, 2016, vol.~201, September, p.~370-376. ISSN~0006-3207. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.005.
|