WINKLEROVÁ, Lucie. Komparace inovačního potenciálu českých krajů (Comparison of innovation potential of the Czech regions). Acta academica karviniensia. Karviná: Slezská univerzita v Opavě, 2016, XVI, No 4, p. 94-105. ISSN 1212-415X.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Komparace inovačního potenciálu českých krajů
Name in Czech Komparace inovačního potenciálu českých krajů
Name (in English) Comparison of innovation potential of the Czech regions
Authors WINKLEROVÁ, Lucie (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Acta academica karviniensia, Karviná, Slezská univerzita v Opavě, 2016, 1212-415X.
Other information
Original language Czech
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50200 5.2 Economics and Business
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/16:00092293
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
Keywords in English comparison; Czech regions; innovation potential; research and development
Tags Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Ing. Lucie Winklerová, Ph.D., učo 171901. Changed: 19/12/2016 14:50.
Abstract
There are many tools to measure and compare the innovation potential and the innovation performance. Each of these instruments uses more or less similar indicators. This article identifies the indicators related to the research, development and innovation, which are available at regional level NUTS3 (14 regions) in the Czech Republic. These indicators are analysed with respect to their development in the period 2001-2014. Via a coefficient calculated they are subsequently combined into one aggregate indicator characterizing the innovation potential of each region. This merger was made both for the beginning and the end of the reporting period to be able to compare the development of innovation potential of Czech regions. Absolutely the best results were achieved in Prague followed by the South Moravian Region and the worst are found in the Karlovy Vary Region in the long term. However, through a calculated coefficient it was found that there is stabilization in the development of regional differences of innovation potential of Czech regions. In the last part, the article outlines options for further follow-up research.
Abstract (in English)
There are many tools to measure and compare the innovation potential and the innovation performance. Each of these instruments uses more or less similar indicators. This article identifies the indicators related to the research, development and innovation, which are available at regional level NUTS3 (14 regions) in the Czech Republic. These indicators are analysed with respect to their development in the period 2001-2014. Via a coefficient calculated they are subsequently combined into one aggregate indicator characterizing the innovation potential of each region. This merger was made both for the beginning and the end of the reporting period to be able to compare the development of innovation potential of Czech regions. Absolutely the best results were achieved in Prague followed by the South Moravian Region and the worst are found in the Karlovy Vary Region in the long term. However, through a calculated coefficient it was found that there is stabilization in the development of regional differences of innovation potential of Czech regions. In the last part, the article outlines options for further follow-up research.
Links
MUNI/A/0999/2015, interní kód MUName: Inovační výkonnost a její reflexe v inovační politice (Acronym: INOPO)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 24/7/2024 13:27