PROKEŠ, Lubomír, Jitka HEGROVÁ and Viktor KANICKÝ. Analysis of Means (ANOM) as a tool for comparison of sample treatment methods: Testing various mineralization procedures for selenium determination in biological material. Journal of AOAC International. MD USA: AOAC International, 2017, vol. 100, No 1, p. 236-240. ISSN 1060-3271. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.16-0258.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Analysis of Means (ANOM) as a tool for comparison of sample treatment methods: Testing various mineralization procedures for selenium determination in biological material
Authors PROKEŠ, Lubomír (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jitka HEGROVÁ (203 Czech Republic) and Viktor KANICKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Journal of AOAC International, MD USA, AOAC International, 2017, 1060-3271.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 10406 Analytical chemistry
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.087
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14310/17:00108695
Organization unit Faculty of Science
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.16-0258
UT WoS 000392041200031
Keywords in English analysis of means; selenium; mineralization; methods comparison; ICP-OES
Tags NZ, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS., učo 437722. Changed: 9/4/2020 14:39.
Abstract
Several mineralization methods for the determination of selenium using hydride generation optical emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma in biological samples (whole egg powder and pork liver) were compared using the analysis of means (ANOM) method. This statistical tool is suitable for graphical representation of testing on simple comparative experiments. The results yielded by ANOM are identical with those obtained with the commonly used analysis of variance (ANOVA) method; however, the graphical output of ANOM is more illustrative in comparison to ANOVA. Both methods indicated a significant discrepancy between the results obtained using muffle furnace ashing mineralization and the results provided by other mineralization methods. This is probably due to the loss of volatile selenium compounds during the decomposition of organic matter.
Links
ED1.1.00/02.0068, research and development projectName: CEITEC - central european institute of technology
PrintDisplayed: 11/5/2024 00:51