KRPEC, Oldřich, Petr OCELÍK and Hubert SMEKAL. Narrowing the Divide: Perspectives on the Future of Mixed Methods Report From Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. SAGE, 2017, vol. 11, No 1, p. 14-16. ISSN 1558-6898. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689816676660.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Narrowing the Divide: Perspectives on the Future of Mixed Methods Report From Central and Eastern Europe
Name in Czech Dohánění rozdílu: Pohled na Zprávu o budoucnosti smíšených metod ze střední a východní Evropy
Authors KRPEC, Oldřich (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Petr OCELÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Hubert SMEKAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution).
Edition Journal of Mixed Methods Research, SAGE, 2017, 1558-6898.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 50601 Political science
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1558689816676660
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.270
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14230/17:00096002
Organization unit Faculty of Social Studies
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1558689816676660
UT WoS 000392616000003
Keywords (in Czech) smíšené metody; metodologie; Střední a východní Evropa; Česká republika
Keywords in English Mixed Methods Research; Methodology; Central and Eastern Europe; Czech Republic
Tags Central and Eastern Europe, Czech Republic, Methodology, mixed methods research, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Mgr. Michal Petr, učo 65024. Changed: 18/3/2020 16:29.
Abstract
The main aim of this article is to place the report ‘‘The Future of Mixed Methods: A Five Year Projection to 2020’’ to the context of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). First, the impact of the heritage of socialist regimes, such as the institutional discontinuities and the hegemony of historical methods, on the quality of methodology in research and in education is described. It is argued that most local academics typically rejected quantification of social science and advocated for the use of qualitative and interpretative approaches, yet (qualitative) methodological rigor was missing. Second, the persisting specific regional challenges to the rigorous use of methodology are presented. These include high levels of inbreeding, lack of methodologically competent PhD supervision, and a strong path dependency of research career trajectories. As post-transitional societies have experienced serious and unique problems, only a limited number of CEE academics and institutions possess necessary methodological skills to participate in the current research debates. Finally, it is asserted that mixed methods research (MMR) is well suited to overcome the path dependency and help avoid the unproductive ‘‘paradigm war’’ fought elsewhere for decades. Based on the recommendations made by the Report, windows of opportunity for MMR in the CEE region are introduced, including several concrete steps that would encourage and facilitate this transition. The active participation of the MMR community and an understanding of the context would be extremely helpful for achieving a more rigorous level of methodology in CEE.
Abstract (in Czech)
Hlavním cílem článku je analyzovat zprávu ‘‘The Future of Mixed Methods: A Five Year Projection to 2020’’ z perspektivy střední a východní Evropy.
Links
MUNI/A/1113/2015, interní kód MUName: Evropa v měnícím se mezinárodním prostředí II
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
MUNI/M/0081/2013, interní kód MUName: Energetická infrastruktura a její vliv na energetickou bezpečnost
Investor: Masaryk University, INTERDISCIPLINARY - Interdisciplinary research projects
PrintDisplayed: 25/4/2024 17:07