J 2016

Letter to the editor referring to the publication entitled “The role of antagonists of the PD-1:PD-L1/PD-L2 axis in head and neck cancer treatment” by Pai et al.

SZTURZ, Petr and S. FAIVRE

Basic information

Original name

Letter to the editor referring to the publication entitled “The role of antagonists of the PD-1:PD-L1/PD-L2 axis in head and neck cancer treatment” by Pai et al.

Authors

SZTURZ, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and S. FAIVRE (250 France)

Edition

Oral Oncology, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science BV, 2016, 1368-8375

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Article in a journal

Field of Study

30200 3.2 Clinical medicine

Country of publisher

Netherlands

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Impact factor

Impact factor: 4.794

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/16:00092818

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000392635300002

EID Scopus

2-s2.0-84994460785

Keywords in English

squamous-cell carcinoma; recurrent; methotrexate; trial

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 1/3/2017 09:23, Ing. Mgr. Věra Pospíšilíková

Abstract

V originále

As addressed by Pai with co-workers in their comprehensive review, novel immunotherapeutic strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors represent a promising area of research in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) [1]. Results from a phase III trial and preliminary data from three early clinical studies demonstrated the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and its ligand PD-L1 (durvalumab) as second-line treatments in the recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) setting. With relatively low incidence of serious adverse events, these agents elicited durable responses even in patients with refractory disease. Moreover, nivolumab, as the first drug ever, significantly improved overall survival (OS) by 2.4 months compared with investigator’s choice (single-agent chemotherapy or cetuximab) [1–4]. From a broader perspective, these pioneering studies have important implications for future trial design with one of the challenges being the selection of appropriate clinical endpoints associated with benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitors.