CHNG, W.J., H. GOLDSCHMIDT, M.A. DIMOPOULOS, P. MOREAU, D. JOSHUA, A. PALUMBO, T. FACON, H. LUDWIG, Luděk POUR, R. NIESVIZKY, A. ORIOL, L. ROSIÑOL, A. SUVOROV, G. GAIDANO, T. PIKA, K. WEISEL, V. GORANOVA-MARINOVA, H.H. GILLENWATER, N. MOHAMED, S. FENG, S. AGGARWAL and R. HÁJEK. Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR. Leukemia. London: Nature Publishing Group, 2017, vol. 31, No 6, p. 1368-1374. ISSN 0887-6924. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.390.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma by cytogenetic risk in the phase 3 study ENDEAVOR
Authors CHNG, W.J., H. GOLDSCHMIDT, M.A. DIMOPOULOS, P. MOREAU, D. JOSHUA, A. PALUMBO, T. FACON, H. LUDWIG, Luděk POUR, R. NIESVIZKY, A. ORIOL, L. ROSIÑOL, A. SUVOROV, G. GAIDANO, T. PIKA, K. WEISEL, V. GORANOVA-MARINOVA, H.H. GILLENWATER, N. MOHAMED, S. FENG, S. AGGARWAL and R. HÁJEK.
Edition Leukemia, London, Nature Publishing Group, 2017, 0887-6924.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30205 Hematology
Country of publisher United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
WWW URL
Impact factor Impact factor: 10.023
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/leu.2016.390
UT WoS 000402832700015
Keywords in English LOW-DOSE DEXAMETHASONE; STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; PLUS DEXAMETHASONE; INTERGROUPE FRANCOPHONE; DELETION 17P; LENALIDOMIDE; THERAPY; ABNORMALITIES; POMALIDOMIDE; THALIDOMIDE
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 16/3/2018 15:01.
Abstract
The randomized phase 3 study ENDEAVOR demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). We conducted a preplanned subgroup analysis of ENDEAVOR to evaluate Kd vs Vd by cytogenetic risk. Of 785 patients with known cytogenetics, 210 (27%) had high-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=97 [25%]; Vd, n=113 [28%]) and 575 (73%) had standard-risk cytogenetics (Kd, n=284 [75%]; Vd, n=291 [72%]). Median PFS in the high-risk group was 8.8 months for Kd vs 6.0 months for Vd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45–0.92; P=0.0075). Median PFS in the standard-risk group was not estimable for Kd vs 10.2 months for Vd (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.33–0.58; P<0.0001). Overall response rates were 72.2% (Kd) vs 58.4% (Vd) in the high-risk group and 79.2% (Kd) vs 66.0% (Vd) in the standard-risk group. In the high-risk group, 15.5% (Kd) vs 4.4% (Vd) achieved a complete response (CR) or better. In the standard-risk group, 13.0% (Kd) vs 7.9% (Vd) achieved greater than or equal toCR. This preplanned subgroup analysis found that Kd was superior to Vd in relapsed or refractory MM, regardless of cytogenetic risk.
PrintDisplayed: 26/4/2024 19:58