Authors
BOOIJ, Kees (528 Netherlands), Craig D. ROBINSON (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Robert M. BURGESS (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Philipp MAYER (208 Denmark), Cindy A. ROBERTS (840 United States of America), Lutz AHRENS (752 Sweden), Ian J. ALLAN (578 Norway), Jan BRANT (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland), Lisa JONES (372 Ireland), Uta R. KRAUS (276 Germany), Martin M. LARSEN (208 Denmark), Peter LEPOM (276 Germany), Joerdis PETERSEN (276 Germany), Daniel PROFROCK (276 Germany), Patrick ROOSE (56 Belgium), Sabine SCHAFER (276 Germany), Foppe SMEDES (528 Netherlands, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Celine TIXIER (250 France), Katrin VORKAMP (208 Denmark) and Paul WHITEHOUSE (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Edition
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, WASHINGTON, AMER CHEMICAL SOC, 2016, 0013-936X
V originále
We reviewed compliance monitoring requirements in the European Union, the United States, and the Oslo-Paris Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic, and evaluated if these are met by passive sampling methods for nonpolar compounds. The strengths and shortcomings of passive sampling are assessed for water, sediments, and biota. Passive water sampling is a suitable technique for measuring concentrations of freely dissolved compounds. This method yields results that are incompatible with the EU's quality standard definition in terms of total concentrations in water, but this definition has little scientific basis. Insufficient quality control is a present weakness of passive sampling in water. Laboratory performance studies and the development of standardized methods are needed to improve data quality and to encourage the use of passive sampling by commercial laboratories and monitoring agencies. Successful prediction of bioaccumulation based on passive sampling is well documented for organisms at the lower trophic levels, but requires more research for higher levels. Despite the existence of several knowledge gaps, passive sampling presently is the best available technology for chemical monitoring of nonpolar organic compounds. Key issues to be addressed by scientists and environmental managers are outlined.