J 2017

Sensitivity of Follow-Up Methods in Patients After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancers

SLAMA, Jiri, Daniela FISCHEROVA, Michal ZIKAN, Roman KOCIAN, Anna GERMANOVA et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Sensitivity of Follow-Up Methods in Patients After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Cervical Cancers

Authors

SLAMA, Jiri (203 Czech Republic), Daniela FISCHEROVA (203 Czech Republic), Michal ZIKAN (203 Czech Republic), Roman KOCIAN (203 Czech Republic), Anna GERMANOVA (203 Czech Republic), Filip FRUHAUF (203 Czech Republic), Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and David CIBULA (203 Czech Republic)

Edition

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2017, 1048-891X

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30204 Oncology

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.192

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00096203

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000391946600022

Keywords in English

Fertility-sparing surgery; Cervical cancer; Recurrence

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/3/2018 17:21, Soňa Böhmová

Abstract

V originále

Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the sensitivity of various methods and their combinations in the follow-up of patients with cervical cancer after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). Methods: Included were women with cervical cancer in stages IA2 to IB2 who underwent FSS, which includes pelvic lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, abdominal radical trachelectomy, vaginal trachelectomy, or needle conization. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 3-month intervals and included symptom-oriented discussion, gynecological and physical examination, colposcopy, Papanicolaou test, human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test, and ultrasound examination. All cases with a recurrent disease were thoroughly analyzed, and the results of individual examinations were compared. Results: In total, 43 women (IA2, 8; IB1, 33; IB2, 2) were enrolled. The mean patient age was 31 years; most patients were nulliparous (68.4%, 26/38) with squamous cell cancers (26/38). Abdominal radical trachelectomy was performed in 10 women, simple vaginal trachelectomy was performed in 11 women, and conization was performed in 22 women, according to the tumor characteristics and topography. The median duration of the follow-up reached 37 months. Invasive cancer and high- and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were detected in 8, 1, and 1 patients, respectively. All except 1 event were central, detected within the first year after FSS. Only 2 cases were symptomatic. Colposcopy detected 7 of 10 recurrences; 5 of them were HPV positive, and, in 2 cases, a Papanicolaou test revealed abnormalities. Papanicolaou tests were false positive in 27.7%, especially after trachelectomies. Conclusions: Most patients in whom cancer recurred after FSS reveal central or pelvic lesions, which can be successfully treated with salvage surgery or radiotherapy. The early detection of recurrence is an essential condition for a favorable oncological outcome. Colposcopy alone and in combination with HPV positivity showed the highest sensitivity for the detection of recurrent diseases, whereas other methods had limited reliability.