Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Using long-term air monitoring of semi-volatile organic compounds to evaluate the uncertainty in polyurethane-disk passive sampler-derived air concentrations
HOLT, Eva Mary Suzanne, Pernilla BOHLIN-NIZZETTO, Jana BORŮVKOVÁ, Tom HARNER, Jiří KALINA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Using long-term air monitoring of semi-volatile organic compounds to evaluate the uncertainty in polyurethane-disk passive sampler-derived air concentrations
Authors
HOLT, Eva Mary Suzanne (36 Australia, belonging to the institution), Pernilla BOHLIN-NIZZETTO (752 Sweden), Jana BORŮVKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tom HARNER (124 Canada), Jiří KALINA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Lisa Emily MELYMUK (124 Canada, belonging to the institution) and Jana KLÁNOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Environmental Pollution, OXFORD, ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2017, 0269-7491
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30304 Public and environmental health
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.358
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/17:00096246
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000390732300038
Keywords in English
Passive sampling; Air monitoring; Data interpretation; Data comparability; Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs)
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/4/2018 18:16, Ing. Nicole Zrilić
Abstract
V originále
Much effort has been made to standardise sampling procedures, laboratory analysis, data analysis, etc. for semi volatile organic contaminants (SVOCs). Yet there are some unresolved issues in regards to comparing measurements from one of the most commonly used passive samplers (PAS), the polyurethane foam (PUF) disk PAS (PUF-PAS), between monitoring networks or different studies. One such issue is that there is no universal means to derive a sampling rate (R-s) or to calculate air concentrations (Cab(air)) from PUF-PAS measurements for SVOCs. C-air was calculated from PUF-PAS measurements from a long-term monitoring program at a site in central Europe applying current understanding of passive sampling theory coupled with a consideration for the sampling of particle associated compounds. Cair were assessed against concurrent active air sampler (AAS) measurements. Use of "site-based/sampler-specific" variables: R-s, calculated using a site calibration, provided similar results for most gas-phase SVOCs to air concentrations derived using "default" values (commonly accepted R-s). Individual monthly PUF-PAS-derived air concentrations for the majority of the target compounds were significantly different (Wilcoxon signed-rank (WSR) test; p < 0.05) to AAS regardless of the input values (site/sampler based or default) used to calculate them. However, annual average PUF-PAS-derived air concentrations were within the same order of magnitude as AAS measurements except for the particle-phase polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Underestimation of PUF-derived air concentrations for particle-phase PAHs was attributed to a potential overestimation of the particle infiltration into the PUF-PAS chamber and underestimation of the particle bound fraction of PAHs.
Links
EHP-CZ02-OV-1-029-2015, interní kód MU |
| ||
LM2015037, research and development project |
| ||
LM2015051, research and development project |
| ||
LO1214, research and development project |
|