Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in
Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell
counts

J 2017

Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts

LIZOŇOVÁ, Zuzana and Michal HORSÁK

Basic information

Original name

Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts

Authors

LIZOŇOVÁ, Zuzana (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Michal HORSÁK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

European Journal of Protistology, JENA, GERMANY, ELSEVIER, 2017, 0932-4739

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Country of publisher

Netherlands

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 2.430

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/17:00094694

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2017.02.002

UT WoS

000400530600009

Keywords in English

Brown mosses; Individual counts; Methodology optimization; Sphagnum; Spring fens; Testate amoebae

Abstract

V originále

Ecological studies of peatland testate amoebae are generally based on totals of 150 individuals per sample. However, thesuitability of this standard has never been assessed for alkaline habitats such as spring fens. We explored the differences intestate amoeba diversity between Sphagnum and brown-moss microhabitats at a mire site with a highly diversified moss layerwhich reflects the small-scale heterogeneity in groundwater chemistry. Relationships between sampling efficiency and samplecompleteness were explored using individual-based species accumulation curves and the effort required to gain an extra specieswas assessed. Testate amoeba diversity differed substantially between microhabitats, with brown mosses hosting on averagetwice as many species and requiring greater shell totals to reach comparable sample analysis efficiency as for Sphagnum.Thus, for samples from alkaline conditions an increase in shell totals would be required and even an overall doubling up to300 individuals might be considered for reliable community description. Our small-scale data are likely not robust enough toprovide an ultimate solution for the optimization of shell totals. However, the results proved that testate amoebae communitiesfrom acidic and alkaline environments differ sharply in both species richness and composition and they might call for differentmethodological approaches.

Links

GA16-03881S, research and development project

Name: Koexistence vodních bezobratlých na prameništních slatiništích: úloha abiotické heterogenity a biotických interakcí na regionální a lokální škále

Investor: Czech Science Foundation

MUNI/A/1301/2016, interní kód MU

Name: Diverzita, dynamika a fylogenetické vztahy klíčových společenstev významných evropských biotopů (Acronym: DIDYF)

Investor: Masaryk University, Category A

Citovat

LIZOŇOVÁ, Zuzana and Michal HORSÁK. Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts. European Journal of Protistology. JENA, GERMANY: ELSEVIER, 2017, vol. 58, April, p. 135-142. ISSN 0932-4739. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2017.02.002.

@article{1376770,
   author = {Lizoňová, Zuzana and Horsák, Michal},
   article_location = {JENA, GERMANY},
   article_number = {April},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2017.02.002},
   keywords = {Brown mosses; Individual counts; Methodology optimization; Sphagnum; Spring fens; Testate amoebae},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0932-4739},
   journal = {European Journal of Protistology},
   title = {Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts},
   volume = {58},
   year = {2017}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1376770
AU  - Lizoňová, Zuzana - Horsák, Michal
PY  - 2017
TI  - Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts
JF  - European Journal of Protistology
VL  - 58
IS  - April
SP  - 135-142
EP  - 135-142
PB  - ELSEVIER
SN  - 09324739
KW  - Brown mosses
KW  - Individual counts
KW  - Methodology optimization
KW  - Sphagnum
KW  - Spring fens
KW  - Testate amoebae
N2  - Ecological studies of peatland testate amoebae are generally based on totals of 150 individuals per sample. However, thesuitability of this standard has never been assessed for alkaline habitats such as spring fens. We explored the differences intestate amoeba diversity between Sphagnum and brown-moss microhabitats at a mire site with a highly diversified moss layerwhich reflects the small-scale heterogeneity in groundwater chemistry. Relationships between sampling efficiency and samplecompleteness were explored using individual-based species accumulation curves and the effort required to gain an extra specieswas assessed. Testate amoeba diversity differed substantially between microhabitats, with brown mosses hosting on averagetwice as many species and requiring greater shell totals to reach comparable sample analysis efficiency as for Sphagnum.Thus, for samples from alkaline conditions an increase in shell totals would be required and even an overall doubling up to300 individuals might be considered for reliable community description. Our small-scale data are likely not robust enough toprovide an ultimate solution for the optimization of shell totals. However, the results proved that testate amoebae communitiesfrom acidic and alkaline environments differ sharply in both species richness and composition and they might call for differentmethodological approaches.
ER  -

LIZOŇOVÁ, Zuzana and Michal HORSÁK. Contrasting diversity of testate amoebae communities in Sphagnum and brown-moss dominated patches in relation to shell counts. \textit{European Journal of Protistology}. JENA, GERMANY: ELSEVIER, 2017, vol.~58, April, p.~135-142. ISSN~0932-4739. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2017.02.002.

Detailed Information on Publication Record