KALA, Petr, Milan BLAHA, Martin MATES, Michael ŽELÍZKO, Marian BRANNY, Viktor KOČKA, Martin TŘETINA, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ, Petr NĚMEC, Josef ŠŤÁSEK and Pavel ČERVINKA. Czech TAVI registry – Hospital outcome. Cor et Vasa. Brno: Česká kardiologická společnost, 2017, vol. 59, No 1, p. "e51"-"e56", 6 pp. ISSN 0010-8650. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.02.002.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Czech TAVI registry – Hospital outcome
Authors KALA, Petr (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Milan BLAHA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Martin MATES (203 Czech Republic), Michael ŽELÍZKO (203 Czech Republic), Marian BRANNY (203 Czech Republic), Viktor KOČKA (203 Czech Republic), Martin TŘETINA (203 Czech Republic), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr NĚMEC (203 Czech Republic), Josef ŠŤÁSEK (203 Czech Republic) and Pavel ČERVINKA (203 Czech Republic).
Edition Cor et Vasa, Brno, Česká kardiologická společnost, 2017, 0010-8650.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/17:00096426
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvasa.2017.02.002
UT WoS 000410029900009
Keywords in English Aortic valve implantation; Czech; High risk; Registry; TAVI
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 13/3/2018 17:30.
Abstract
The first TAVI in the Czech Republic was performed in 2008 and since then, more than 90% of TAVI procedures have been involved in the online all comers Czech TAVI Registry. 1532 TAVI procedures from 2008 till June 2016 in a high risk population with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (logistic EuroSCORE 18.2, median age 80 years) were relatively safe (in-hospital mortality 3.9%, severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation after TAVI 1.0%) and highly effective (index of aortic valve area before versus after TAVI was 0.4 cm2/m2 versus 1.0 cm2/m2, respectively). Majority of patients (83.7%) underwent TAVI because of their high risk for surgery assessed by the Heart team discussion and 71.9% of them were discharged home.
PrintDisplayed: 4/8/2024 22:13