Podrobný výpis o publikaci

SLAVÍČEK, Karel, Jan PETŘÍK, Petr ŽAŽA, Vladimír MITÁŠ a Václav FURMÁNEK. Technological and provenance analyses of the south-eastern Urnfield culture pottery from the sites of Cinobaňa and Málinec (Poltár region, Slovakia). Praehistorische Zeitschrift. Berlin: WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH, 2017, roč. 92, č. 1, s. 162-175. ISSN 0079-4848. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2017-0007.

Další formáty: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

Základní údaje
Originální název	Technological and provenance analyses of the south-eastern Urnfield culture pottery from the sites of Cinobaňa and Málinec (Poltár region, Slovakia)
Autoři	SLAVÍČEK, Karel (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Jan PETŘÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr ŽAŽA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vladimír MITÁŠ (703 Slovensko) a Václav FURMÁNEK (703 Slovensko).
Vydání	Praehistorische Zeitschrift, Berlin, WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH, 2017, 0079-4848.

Další údaje
Originální jazyk	angličtina
Typ výsledku	Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor	60100 6.1 History and Archaeology
Stát vydavatele	Německo
Utajení	není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor	Impact factor: 0.750
Kód RIV	RIV/00216224:14310/17:00096832
Organizační jednotka	Přírodovědecká fakulta
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pz-2017-0007
UT WoS	000409199900007
Klíčová slova anglicky	pottery; technology; provenance; archaeometry; Late and Final Bronze Age; Slovakia
Štítky	NZ, rivok
Příznaky	Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil	Změnila: Ing. Nicole Zrilić, učo 240776. Změněno: 12. 4. 2018 10:52.

Anotace
Pottery samples from the site of Cinobaňa were chosen for a pilot study of the Kyjatice and Piliny cultures in Slovakia. They come from the cemetery of Jarčanisko I, the settlement of Jarčanisko II, and the hillfort of Strieborná. For comparison, the material from the hillfort of Málinec-Zámok was used. The samples were divided into six micro-petrographical fabric groups which were tested on the basis of the chemical composition using the XRF method. The fabric groups from the cemetery and the settlement are mutually exclusive, except for one group. For the majority of the fabric groups, the use of older crushed pottery as temper was detected. The presence of grog in the pottery may reflect specific technological or symbolical practices by the Late and Final Bronze Age populations. The diversity in the pottery from the cemetery shows the heterogeneity of the production traditions of local communities. The similarities in the micro-petrography and chemical composition of the samples from the settlement point to the economic or social connectivity of the sites studied.

Anotace

Pottery samples from the site of Cinobaňa were chosen for a pilot study of the Kyjatice and Piliny cultures in Slovakia. They come from the cemetery of Jarčanisko I, the settlement of Jarčanisko II, and the hillfort of Strieborná. For comparison, the material from the hillfort of Málinec-Zámok was used. The samples were divided into six micro-petrographical fabric groups which were tested on the basis of the chemical composition using the XRF method. The fabric groups from the cemetery and the settlement are mutually exclusive, except for one group. For the majority of the fabric groups, the use of older crushed pottery as temper was detected. The presence of grog in the pottery may reflect specific technological or symbolical practices by the Late and Final Bronze Age populations. The diversity in the pottery from the cemetery shows the heterogeneity of the production traditions of local communities. The similarities in the micro-petrography and chemical composition of the samples from the settlement point to the economic or social connectivity of the sites studied.