J 2017

Technological and provenance analyses of the south-eastern Urnfield culture pottery from the sites of Cinobaňa and Málinec (Poltár region, Slovakia)

SLAVÍČEK, Karel, Jan PETŘÍK, Petr ŽAŽA, Vladimír MITÁŠ, Václav FURMÁNEK et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Technological and provenance analyses of the south-eastern Urnfield culture pottery from the sites of Cinobaňa and Málinec (Poltár region, Slovakia)

Authors

SLAVÍČEK, Karel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Jan PETŘÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petr ŽAŽA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Vladimír MITÁŠ (703 Slovakia) and Václav FURMÁNEK (703 Slovakia)

Edition

Praehistorische Zeitschrift, Berlin, WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH, 2017, 0079-4848

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

60100 6.1 History and Archaeology

Country of publisher

Germany

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 0.750

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/17:00096832

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

000409199900007

Keywords in English

pottery; technology; provenance; archaeometry; Late and Final Bronze Age; Slovakia

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 12/4/2018 10:52, Ing. Nicole Zrilić

Abstract

V originále

Pottery samples from the site of Cinobaňa were chosen for a pilot study of the Kyjatice and Piliny cultures in Slovakia. They come from the cemetery of Jarčanisko I, the settlement of Jarčanisko II, and the hillfort of Strieborná. For comparison, the material from the hillfort of Málinec-Zámok was used. The samples were divided into six micro-petrographical fabric groups which were tested on the basis of the chemical composition using the XRF method. The fabric groups from the cemetery and the settlement are mutually exclusive, except for one group. For the majority of the fabric groups, the use of older crushed pottery as temper was detected. The presence of grog in the pottery may reflect specific technological or symbolical practices by the Late and Final Bronze Age populations. The diversity in the pottery from the cemetery shows the heterogeneity of the production traditions of local communities. The similarities in the micro-petrography and chemical composition of the samples from the settlement point to the economic or social connectivity of the sites studied.