Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Joining science and policy in capacity development for monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in the global South
VANHOVE, Maarten Pieterjan, Anne-Julie ROCHETTE and Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVENBasic information
Original name
Joining science and policy in capacity development for monitoring progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in the global South
Authors
VANHOVE, Maarten Pieterjan (56 Belgium, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Anne-Julie ROCHETTE (56 Belgium) and Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN (56 Belgium)
Edition
Ecological Indicators, AMSTERDAM (NETHERLANDS), ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2017, 1470-160X
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10600 1.6 Biological sciences
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.983
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/17:00096983
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000398334400069
Keywords in English
Development cooperation; Indicator; Technology transfer; Measuring reporting and verification (MRV); Ecosystem services
Změněno: 5/4/2018 22:19, Ing. Nicole Zrilić
Abstract
V originále
In view of better linking conservation and sustainable development, it is imperative to optimize the transfer of biodiversity-related knowledge and technology from resource-rich countries to developing countries. All countries signatory to the Convention on Biological Diversity are expected to report on their progress towards achieving the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. However, weak data coverage and the technicality or even unavailability of indicators present major barriers to the monitoring of biodiversity as well as the development of adequate biodiversity policies and management plans in many countries of the global South, hence increasing the North-South knowledge and capacity gap. Capacity development in these countries may hence substantially enrich global biodiversity monitoring and policy. In this effort, ensuring that monitoring programs are realistic and sufficiently embedded in policy remains a challenge. To contribute to the mainstreaming of biodiversity into development cooperation, we developed a capacity development concept that links scientific data to policy development. To guarantee shared ownership, academic institutes and organisations or authorities with responsibilities in biodiversity policy were invited to jointly submit competitive "Monitoring, Reporting and Verification" (MRV) project applications. It appeared that especially ground truthing, economic valuation of biodiversity, and the application of modern technologies in biodiversity monitoring were missing capacities in the global South. Efforts are also required to increase the understanding and use of indicators to avoid them remaining a theoretical concept. As is observed with MRV in the carbon context, increased involvement of local communities is recommended in the global MRV framework, including techniques such as community-based Mapping, Measuring and Monitoring. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.