Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1385574,
author = {Vobořil, Dalibor and Jelínek, Martin and Květon, Petr},
article_location = {CHAMPAIGN},
article_number = {2},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.2.0245},
language = {eng},
issn = {0002-9556},
journal = {AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY},
title = {Experimental Evaluation of Tachistoscopic Measurement: A Step Beyond Wundt's Criticism},
volume = {127},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1385574
AU - Vobořil, Dalibor - Jelínek, Martin - Květon, Petr
PY - 2014
TI - Experimental Evaluation of Tachistoscopic Measurement: A Step Beyond Wundt's Criticism
JF - AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY
VL - 127
IS - 2
SP - 245-252
EP - 245-252
PB - UNIV ILLINOIS PRESS
SN - 00029556
N2 - This study was designed to assess the possible systematic bias in measurements obtained using tachistoscopic devices from different historical periods of psychological research. Four different tachistoscopic devices were used for brief presentations of stimuli in a letter recognition task. The research sample consisted of 24 participants (12 female, 12 male) in a within-subject experimental design with complete counterbalancing of 4 conditions defined by 4 instrument types: fall tachistoscope, tachistoscope with camera-like shutter, and computer-based tachistoscopes with cathode ray tube and liquid crystal diode display screens. The effects of experimental conditions were examined using a linear mixed model analysis. Our experiment demonstrated that even in standardized settings the type of tachistoscope used for stimulus presentation systematically influenced the participants' performance. We found that the lowest number of correctly recalled stimuli, as well as the highest number of erroneously recalled stimuli, was produced in the camera-like tachistoscope condition. Together, these findings suggest that when results from studies involving tachistoscopic experiments are reviewed, the unique characteristics of each particular instrument used must be considered carefully.
ER -
VOBOŘIL, Dalibor, Martin JELÍNEK a Petr KVĚTON. Experimental Evaluation of Tachistoscopic Measurement: A Step Beyond Wundt's Criticism. Online. \textit{AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY}. CHAMPAIGN: UNIV ILLINOIS PRESS, 2014, roč.~127, č.~2, s.~245-252. ISSN~0002-9556. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.2.0245. [citováno 2024-04-24]
|
