J 2017

Determining Jurisdiction (and the Applicable Law) in Cross-Border Unfair Competition and Unfair Commercial Practices Cases

ROHOVÁ, Iveta and David SEHNÁLEK

Basic information

Original name

Determining Jurisdiction (and the Applicable Law) in Cross-Border Unfair Competition and Unfair Commercial Practices Cases

Name in Czech

Určení soudní příslušnosti (a práva rozhodného) v případech nekalosoutěžního jednání a nekalých obchodních praktik s mezimnárodním prvkem

Authors

ROHOVÁ, Iveta (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and David SEHNÁLEK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

LeXonomica, Maribor, University of Maribor, 2017, 1855-7155

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

Slovenia

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/17:00102016

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

UT WoS

000448407800002

Keywords (in Czech)

nekalosoutěžní jednání; nekalé obchodní praktiky; mezinárodní prvek; mezinárodní právo soukromé; soudní příslušnost; rozhodné právo; deliktní jednání v prostředí internetu s přeshraničním dosahem

Keywords in English

unfair competition; unfair commercial practices; cross-border element; private international law; jurisdiction; applicable law; on-line torts in cross-border context

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 14/7/2020 09:21, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Abstract

V originále

The free movement of goods promotes cross-border transactions. Computerization of services and intensified use of the Internet also contribute to the development of trade within the EU. Problems that could once be addressed almost exclusively or at least prevailingly at a national level currently assume cross-border character. This is also true in the case of regulation of unfair competition and unfair commercial practices. Whereas the substantive regulation of unfair competition in both EU and domestic law is quite common in scientific literature, its aspects in private international law are often neglected. Since the EU law has to a large extent replaced national conflict-of-law and procedural rules with unified EU provisions, this article focuses on the EU regulations Rome II and Brussels I bis with the emphasis put on the latter. The aim of this article is to review the rules determining jurisdiction (and the applicable law) on the basis of legal doctrine, current legislation and case law of the Court of Justice of the EU. Attention also will be paid to both off-line and on-line situations, as well as to the specifics of consumer protection in the context of unfair competition and unfair commercial practices

Files attached