BOEDDINGHAUS, J., T. NESTELBERGER, R. TWERENBOLD, K. WILDI, P. BADERTSCHER, J. CUPA, T. BURGE, P. MACHLER, S. CORBIERE, K. GRIMM, M.R. GIMENEZ, C. PUELACHER, S. SHRESTHA, D.F. WIDMER, J. FUHRMANN, P. HILLINGER, Z. SABTI, U. HONEGGER, N. SCHAERLI, N. KOZHUHAROV, K. RENTSCH, O. MIRO, B. LOPEZ, F.J. MARTIN-SANCHEZ, E. RODRIGUEZ-ADRADA, B. MORAWIEC, D. KAWECKI, Eva GANOVSKÁ, Jiří PAŘENICA, J. LOHRMANN, W. KLOOS, A. BUSER, N. GEIGY, D.I. KELLER, S. OSSWALD, T. REICHLIN and C. MUELLER. Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I. Circulation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2017, vol. 135, No 17, p. "1597"-"+", 31 pp. ISSN 0009-7322. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025661.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Direct Comparison of 4 Very Early Rule-Out Strategies for Acute Myocardial Infarction Using High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I
Authors BOEDDINGHAUS, J. (380 Italy), T. NESTELBERGER (380 Italy), R. TWERENBOLD (380 Italy), K. WILDI (380 Italy), P. BADERTSCHER (380 Italy), J. CUPA (380 Italy), T. BURGE (756 Switzerland), P. MACHLER (756 Switzerland), S. CORBIERE (380 Italy), K. GRIMM (380 Italy), M.R. GIMENEZ (380 Italy), C. PUELACHER (380 Italy), S. SHRESTHA (380 Italy), D.F. WIDMER (380 Italy), J. FUHRMANN (756 Switzerland), P. HILLINGER (380 Italy), Z. SABTI (380 Italy), U. HONEGGER (380 Italy), N. SCHAERLI (380 Italy), N. KOZHUHAROV (380 Italy), K. RENTSCH (756 Switzerland), O. MIRO (724 Spain), B. LOPEZ (724 Spain), F.J. MARTIN-SANCHEZ (724 Spain), E. RODRIGUEZ-ADRADA (724 Spain), B. MORAWIEC (616 Poland), D. KAWECKI (616 Poland), Eva GANOVSKÁ (703 Slovakia, belonging to the institution), Jiří PAŘENICA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), J. LOHRMANN (756 Switzerland), W. KLOOS (756 Switzerland), A. BUSER (756 Switzerland), N. GEIGY (756 Switzerland), D.I. KELLER (756 Switzerland), S. OSSWALD (756 Switzerland), T. REICHLIN (756 Switzerland) and C. MUELLER (756 Switzerland).
Edition Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2017, 0009-7322.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 18.881
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/17:00097703
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025661
UT WoS 000400006400010
Keywords in English diagnosis; myocardial infarction; rule-out strategies
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 21/3/2018 16:03.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Four strategies for very early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) have been identified. It remains unclear which strategy is most attractive for clinical application. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists. Hs-cTnI levels were measured at presentation and after 1 hour in a blinded fashion. We directly compared all 4 hs-cTnI-based rule-out strategies: limit of detection (LOD, hs-cTnI<2 ng/L), single cutoff (hs-cTnI<5 ng/L), 1-hour algorithm (hs-cTnI<5 ng/L and 1-hour change<2 ng/L), and the 0/1-hour algorithm recommended in the European Society of Cardiology guideline combining LOD and 1-hour algorithm. RESULTS: Among 2828 enrolled patients, acute myocardial infarction was the final diagnosis in 451 (16%) patients. The LOD approach ruled out 453 patients (16%) with a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.2%-100%), the single cutoff 1516 patients (54%) with a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI, 95.1%-98.3%), the 1-hour algorithm 1459 patients (52%) with a sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.2%), and the 0/1-hour algorithm 1463 patients (52%) with a sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI, 96.8%-99.2%). Predefined subgroup analysis in early presenters (<= 2 hours) revealed significantly lower sensitivity (94.2%, interaction P=0.03) of the single cutoff, but not the other strategies. Two-year survival was 100% with LOD and 98.1% with the other strategies (P<0.01 for LOD versus each of the other strategies). CONCLUSIONS: All 4 rule-out strategies balance effectiveness and safety equally well. The single cutoff should not be applied in early presenters, whereas the 3 other strategies seem to perform well in this challenging subgroup.
PrintDisplayed: 26/4/2024 02:43