Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Importance of Preoperative Knowledge of the Biomarker HE4 in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer Regarding Surgical Management
PRESL, J., Petra OVESNÁ, Z. NOVOTNY, P. VLASAK, J. BOUDA et. al.Basic information
Original name
Importance of Preoperative Knowledge of the Biomarker HE4 in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer Regarding Surgical Management
Authors
PRESL, J. (203 Czech Republic), Petra OVESNÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Z. NOVOTNY (203 Czech Republic), P. VLASAK (203 Czech Republic), J. BOUDA (203 Czech Republic), J. KOSTUN (203 Czech Republic), O. TOPOLCAN (203 Czech Republic), R. KUCERA (203 Czech Republic), Markéta BEDNAŘÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Vít WEINBERGER (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Anticancer Research, Athens, The International Institute of Anticancer Research, 2017, 0250-7005
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30204 Oncology
Country of publisher
Greece
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.865
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098150
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000402173300069
Keywords in English
CA125; HE4; endometrial cancer; preoperative staging
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/3/2018 17:44, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Aim: To analyze the utility of HE4 assessment in preoperative management of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer for stratification into low-risk and high-risk groups. Patients and Methods: The following data were prospectively collected from patients operated for endometrial cancer from 05/2012 till 9/2016; age, HE4, CA125, expert ultrasound examination of the pelvis, histotype, grade, FIGO stage. Results: In total, 124 patients were enrolled. A cut-off of >= 113 pmol/l HE4 demonstrated 40.3% sensitivity and 83.9% specificity for detection of high-risk patients. Correlations of HE4 with age (p<0.001), depth of myometrial invasion (p=0.001), clinical stage of the disease according to ultrasound - T1a vs. T1b (63.6 pmol/l vs. 110.6 pmol/l, p<0.001) were found. However, no correlation of HE4 with lymph node invasion (p=0.07) and tumor grade (p=0.212) was identified. Conclusion: HE4 levels correspond to clinical and FIGO stage of the disease. The sensitivity and specificity does not reach the transvaginal ultrasound results in preoperative assessment of the extent of the disease. Combination of HE4 with ultrasound does not improve the stratification of patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. Preoperative assessment of HE4 is useful providing no imaging method is available.