Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Possibilities of Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Scales for Assessment of the Risk of Pressure Lesions at Selected Intensive Care Workplaces – Pilot Study
SAIBERTOVÁ, Simona and Andrea POKORNÁBasic information
Original name
Possibilities of Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Scales for Assessment of the Risk of Pressure Lesions at Selected Intensive Care Workplaces – Pilot Study
Name in Czech
Možnosti hodnocení psychometrických vlastností škál pro hodnocení rizika vzniku tlakových lézí na vybraných pracovištích v intenzivní péči - pilotní studie
Authors
SAIBERTOVÁ, Simona (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Andrea POKORNÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Česká a slovenská neurologie a neurochirurgie, Praha, Česká lékařská společnost J.E. Purkyně, 2017, 1210-7859
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30103 Neurosciences
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 0.508
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098381
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000416140800007
Keywords in English
pressure ulcer; intensive care; nursing; risk scale
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/3/2018 16:42, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Assessment of the inter-rater reliability of scales for the pressure ulcer development risk (Norton, modified Norton, Braden and Jackson/Cubbin modified by Maarit Ahtiala) in patients hospitalized at intensive care units. Material and methods: The pilot stage for the prospective, observational and descriptive study took place in March 2017 at five intensive care units of four different hospitals in the Czech Republic. For each patient, three regular evaluations of pressure ulcer risk were performed by two independent raters at the given workplace using four standardised scales. The pilot study comprised 26 probands of the total number of 173 hospitalized patients, 61.5% (n = 16) men and 38.5% (n = 10) women. Results: For each evaluation of patients, the first raters provided lower score, which is associated with a higher risk of pressure ulcer development. The average scores at rating scales increase from the first evaluation in the course of hospitalization at intensive care units. Conclusion: An important role in the inter-rater reliability and usability of the rating scales consists in the experience with their use and in thorough education of raters. With regard to the total number of probands in the pilot study (n = 26), it is not possible to draw a definite conclusion with the recommendation for a specific scale for rating the pressure ulcers risks in intensive care unit patients. The evaluators in clinical practice found the Jackson/Cubbin scale modified by Maarit Ahtiala as the most practical.
Links
MUNI/A/0922/2016, interní kód MU |
|