Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial
KOJECKÝ, Vladimír, J. MATOUS, R. KEIL, Milan DASTYCH, Radek KROUPA et. al.Basic information
Original name
A head-to-head comparison of 4-L polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions before colonoscopy: which is the best? A multicentre, randomized trial
Authors
KOJECKÝ, Vladimír (203 Czech Republic), J. MATOUS (203 Czech Republic), R. KEIL (203 Czech Republic), Milan DASTYCH (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Radek KROUPA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Z. ZADOROVA (203 Czech Republic), M. VARGA (203 Czech Republic), Jiří DOLINA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), M. KMENT (203 Czech Republic) and Aleš HEP (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, New York, Springer, 2017, 0179-1958
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30219 Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.533
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098392
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000415692100014
Keywords in English
Ascorbic acid; Colonoscopy; Magnesium citrate; Picosulfate sodium; Polyethylene glycol
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 15/3/2018 17:06, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate (SPMC) and low-volume polyethylene glycol/ascorbic acid (PEGA) in a single- or split-dose regimen for colonoscopy bowel preparation. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, endoscopist-blinded, multicentre study. Outpatients received either PEG or SPMC or PEGA in a single or a split dose before the colonoscopy. Quality and tolerability of the preparation and complaints during preparation were recorded. Results: Nine hundred seventy-three patients were analysed. Satisfactory bowel cleansing (Aronchick score 1 + 2) was more frequent when a split dose was used irrespective of the solution type (PEG 90.1 vs 68.8%, PEGA 86.0 vs 71.6%, SPMC 84.3 vs 60.2%, p < 0.001). SPMC was the best tolerated followed by PEGA (p < 0.006) and PEG as the worst (p < 0.001). Tolerability did not correlate with the regimen and amount of the solution used. Female gender is associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting and pain (p < 0.029). Conclusions: Both PEG, PEGA and SPMC are fully comparable in terms of colonic cleansing when used in similar regimens. The split-dose preparation is more effective in all agents. SPMC and PEGA are better tolerated than PEG. The preparation regimen and/or the volume do not affect tolerability.