Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Occurrence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in clinical practice
NAGY, Andrej, Jolana LIPOLDOVÁ, Miroslav NOVÁK and Radka ŠTĚPÁNOVÁBasic information
Original name
Occurrence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in clinical practice
Authors
NAGY, Andrej (703 Slovakia, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Jolana LIPOLDOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Miroslav NOVÁK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Radka ŠTĚPÁNOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Cor et Vasa, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2017, 0010-8650
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher
Netherlands
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098523
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000410032200001
Keywords in English
ICD; Ventricular fibrillation; Ventricular tachycardia; Remote monitoring; SCD predictors; Programmed ventricular stimulation
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 28/1/2021 11:29, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
V originále
The landmark trials MADIT II, SCD-HeFT, and COMPANION in 2002-2005 years have reported their positive results to sudden cardiac death reduction. Since that time the indications for the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have substantially broadened. The occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy differs in the individual trials. We were retrospectively analyzing the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) from ICD remote monitoring database (Biotronik Home Monitoring TM, www.biotronik-homemonitoring.com). No significant difference was found between subgroups divided by the implantation indication, the programmed ventricular stimulation, the aggressivity of programmed ventricular stimulation protocol, left ventricular ejection fraction, ICD types, percentage of right ventricular pacing, diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction and gender. VT/VF occurred statistically significantly more often in patients with non-sustained VT on the preimplant Holter monitoring report in patients with primary preventive indication for postinfarction coronary artery disease but not in primary preventive indication for non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We observed higher VT/VF occurrence in patients with preimplant syncope or presyncope even higher than in patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. There was a visible trend for higher VT/VF occurrence in patients with positive programmed ventricular stimulation especially with less aggressive protocol and in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction of 30% and less. Authors found the preimplant nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) on Holter monitoring as the only independent predictor of VT/VF occurrence. (C) 2017 The Czech Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Sp. zo.o. All rights reserved.
Links
LM2015090, research and development project |
|