MOTOVSKA, Z., Ota HLINOMAZ and Petr KALA. Response by Motovska et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study". Circulation. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2017, vol. 135, No 15, p. "e887"-"e888", 2 pp. ISSN 0009-7322. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027476.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Response by Motovska et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study"
Authors MOTOVSKA, Z. (203 Czech Republic), Ota HLINOMAZ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Petr KALA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Circulation, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams Wilkins, 2017, 0009-7322.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30201 Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 18.881
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/17:00098711
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027476
UT WoS 000398851900003
Keywords in English Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor
Tags EL OK
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 20/3/2018 17:49.
Abstract
Letter Response by Motovska et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Multicenter Randomized PRAGUE-18 Study".
PrintDisplayed: 22/7/2024 08:19