Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{1399971,
author = {Ráboňová, Petra},
address = {Brno},
booktitle = {Mathematics, Information Technologies and Applied Science 2017},
editor = {Jaromír Baštinec and Miroslav Hrubý},
keywords = {kalibration; transformation function; transformation curve; maximum likelihood method; Kenward Roger's type of approximation},
howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
language = {eng},
location = {Brno},
isbn = {978-80-7582-026-6},
pages = {193-207},
publisher = {University of Defence},
title = {Comparison of Two Polynomial Calibration Methods},
url = {http://mitav.unob.cz/data/MITAV%202017%20Proceedings.pdf},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1399971
AU - Ráboňová, Petra
PY - 2017
TI - Comparison of Two Polynomial Calibration Methods
PB - University of Defence
CY - Brno
SN - 9788075820266
KW - kalibration
KW - transformation function
KW - transformation curve
KW - maximum likelihood method
KW - Kenward Roger's type of approximation
UR - http://mitav.unob.cz/data/MITAV%202017%20Proceedings.pdf
L2 - http://mitav.unob.cz/data/MITAV%202017%20Proceedings.pdf
N2 - In the contribution we focused on comparison of two polynomial calibration methods. We compare a method based on maximum likelihood method, and a method using linearised model with errors in variables and Kenward Roger's type of aproximation. First, we introduce models for boths procedures. Then we estimate unknown parameters of transformation function with use of these models. We compare both methods in a small simulation study.
ER -
RÁBOŇOVÁ, Petra. Comparison of Two Polynomial Calibration Methods. In Jaromír Baštinec and Miroslav Hrubý. \textit{Mathematics, Information Technologies and Applied Science 2017}. Brno: University of Defence. s.~193-207. ISBN~978-80-7582-026-6. 2017.
|
