Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Novice teachers in the Czech Republic: Why do they leave and change schools?
MINAŘÍKOVÁ, Eva, Světlana HANUŠOVÁ, Tomáš KOHOUTEK, Miroslav JANÍK, Tomáš JANÍK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Novice teachers in the Czech Republic: Why do they leave and change schools?
Authors
MINAŘÍKOVÁ, Eva (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Světlana HANUŠOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš KOHOUTEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Miroslav JANÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Tomáš JANÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jan MAREŠ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Klára ULIČNÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
EARLI 2017, 2017
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Prezentace na konferencích
Field of Study
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14410/17:00095379
Organization unit
Faculty of Education
Keywords in English
novice teachers; drop-out
Tags
International impact
Změněno: 9/4/2018 15:15, Dana Nesnídalová
Abstract
V originále
Novice teachers are at a vulnerable stage of their career and are at an increased risk of quitting teaching. Therefore it is necessary to study the drop-out of novice teachers together with the reasons behind it. Our study focuses on Czech primary and secondary beginning teachers (up to three years of experience) and aim to explore how they perceive the interactive and institutional aspects of their job as well as the broader context, how valued and supported they feel, and how this connects to their intention to stay in their school (stayers), change schools (movers) or quit teaching (leavers). Also, we focused on how their views change over time. 126 teachers completed a questionnaire consisting of 70 Likert scale items and additional context questions twice in a school year (with slight adaptations; 6 months between the stages). The distribution of stayers (73 % / 74 %), movers (17 % / 18 %) and leavers (10 % / 10%) was similar in both stages. Statistically significant differences between stayers and movers/leavers were especially in the perception of the institutional level (school, colleagues, school leadership). It is noteworthy that it was the movers who were more negative. This gap widened further with time – in the second stage, movers were even more negative towards their school context, especially towards school leadership. Stayers felt statistically significantly more valued and supported. The findings are important for educational policy as well as provide impulses for the development of teacher education and induction programmes.
Links
GA15-12956S, research and development project |
|