J 2017

Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation

HUGE, Jean, Anne-Julie ROCHETTE, Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN, Farid DAHDOUH-GUEBAS, Nico KOEDAM et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Utilitarian framings of biodiversity shape environmental impact assessment in development cooperation

Authors

HUGE, Jean (56 Belgium), Anne-Julie ROCHETTE (56 Belgium), Luc JANSSENS DE BISTHOVEN (56 Belgium), Farid DAHDOUH-GUEBAS (56 Belgium), Nico KOEDAM (528 Netherlands) and Maarten Pieterjan VANHOVE (56 Belgium, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLICY, OXFORD, ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2017, 1462-9011

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10600 1.6 Biological sciences

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 3.826

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/17:00099402

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

DOI

UT WoS

000407869500011

Keywords in English

Biodiversity; Development cooperation; Environmental impact assessment (ETA); Africa; Baseline

Tags

Změněno: 12/4/2018 18:20, Ing. Nicole Zrilić

Abstract

V originále

Biodiversity is under threat from anthropogenic pressures, in particular in biodiversity-rich developing countries. Development cooperation actors, who traditionally focus on the improvement of socio-economic conditions in the South, are increasingly acknowledging the linkages between poverty and biodiversity, e.g. by referring to the ecosystem services framework. However, there are many different framings which stress the need for biodiversity integration and which influence how biodiversity and development are and/or should be linked. Moreover, there is a gap between the lip service paid to biodiversity integration and the reality of development cooperation interventions. This study analyses how biodiversity framings are reflected in environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice, and how these framings influence EIA and decision-making. The findings, based on an in-depth qualitative analysis of World Bank EIAs undertaken in West Africa, indicate the incoherent quality but also the dominance of the 'utilitarian' and 'corrective' framings, which respectively stress human use of nature and mitigation of negative unintended development impacts. Identifying and highlighting these discursive trends leads to increased awareness of the importance of biodiversity among all development actors in North and South. However, some framings may lead to an overly narrow human-centred approach which downplays the intrinsic value of biodiversity. This study proposes recommendations for an improved integration of biodiversity in development cooperation, including the need for more systematic baseline studies in EIAs.