Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
LABORATORY PERFORMANCE STUDY FOR PASSIVE SAMPLING OF NONPOLAR CHEMICALS IN WATER
BOOIJ, Kees, Foppe SMEDES and Steven CRUMBasic information
Original name
LABORATORY PERFORMANCE STUDY FOR PASSIVE SAMPLING OF NONPOLAR CHEMICALS IN WATER
Authors
BOOIJ, Kees (528 Netherlands), Foppe SMEDES (528 Netherlands, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Steven CRUM (528 Netherlands)
Edition
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Hoboken, NJ USA, Wiley, 2017, 0730-7268
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10511 Environmental sciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.179
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/17:00100056
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000402302300005
Keywords in English
Organic contaminants; Passive sampler; Analytical chemistry; Quality assurance; Interlaboratory study; Proficiency testing
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 6/4/2018 10:53, Ing. Nicole Zrilić
Abstract
V originále
Two laboratory performance studies with 21 and 11 participants were carried out for passive sampling of nonpolar chemicals in water, using silicone samplers that were deployed for 7 wk and 13 wk at 2 river sites in the Netherlands. Target analytes were polychlorinated biphenyls, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexachlorobutadiene, hexachlorobenzene, and a number of performance reference compounds (PRCs). Calculation of aqueous concentrations based on prescribed input values and a prescribed uptake model was also included. Between-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) in the analysis of target compounds were approximately 20% at concentrations of 100 ng g(-1) and approximately 100% at concentrations of 0.01 ng g(-1), which was similar to previous results for the analysis of biota samples. The analysis of PRCs yielded water sampling rates with a between-laboratory CV of 18% to 30%. The sampling rate model showed a nearly perfect match with the consensus values of retained PRCs. The implications of the present study for future interlaboratory exercises are discussed.