J 2017

Vliv pooperačního podání oktreotidu na redukci lymforey a následně vzniku lymfocyst, lymfedému a lymfatického ascitu po lymfadenektomii u gynekologických malignit

WEINBERGER, Vít, Luboš MINÁŘ, Michal FELSINGER, Dagmar SEIDLOVÁ, Petra OVESNÁ et. al.

Basic information

Original name

Vliv pooperačního podání oktreotidu na redukci lymforey a následně vzniku lymfocyst, lymfedému a lymfatického ascitu po lymfadenektomii u gynekologických malignit

Name (in English)

Postoperative administration of octreotide to reduce lymphorrhea, lymphocele, lymphedema and lymphatic ascites after lymphadenectomy in gynecological malignancies

Authors

WEINBERGER, Vít (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Luboš MINÁŘ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michal FELSINGER (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Dagmar SEIDLOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Petra OVESNÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Markéta BEDNAŘÍKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Eva JANDÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Ivo ROVNÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Česká gynekologie, Praha, Nakladatelské a tiskové středisko ČLS JEP, 2017, 1210-7832

Other information

Language

Czech

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology

Country of publisher

Czech Republic

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/17:00100148

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000403505200001

Keywords (in Czech)

lymfadenektomie; lymfatický ascites; Iymfedém; lymfocysta; oktreotid

Keywords in English

lymphadenectomy; lymphatic ascites; lymphedema; lymphocele; octreotide

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 2/3/2018 17:03, Soňa Böhmová

Abstract

V originále

Úvod: Oktreotid je syntetický analog somatostatinu. Vliv oktreotidu na redukci lymforey byl v onkogynekologii hodnocen dosud jen kazuísticky. Typ práce: Původní práce s vlastním souborem pacientek. Název a sídlo pracoviště: Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika LF MU a Fakultní nemocnice Brno, přednosta prof. MUDr. P. Ventruba, DrSc,, MBA. Metodika: Jedná se o prospektivní randomizovanou studii z roku 2014. Pacientky s karcinomem hrdla, těla dělohy a ovaria podstoupily v indikovaných případech pánevní a/nebo paraaortální lymfadenektomii. Oktreotid byl pacientkám podán po randomizaci a zařazení do skupiny s léčbou nebo bez léčby, podepsaly informovaný souhlas. Efekt oktreotidu byl hodnocen v souvislostí s diagnózou, operací (laparoskopíe versus laparotomie), pánevní a/nebo paraaortální lymfadenektomii, počtem odstraněných uzlin a jejich pozitivitou, krevní ztrátou a délkou operačního výkonu, celkovým počtem drénů zavedených do dutiny břišní, neoadjuvantnía adjuvantní chemoterapií, adjuvantní radioterapií, hladinou albuminu předoperačně, BMI, počtem dní s dřeném po operaci a počtem dní hospitalizace.

In English

Introduction: Octreotide is a synthetic analogue of natural somatostatin. Octreotide effect on lymphorrhea reduction in gynecological malignancies has only been assessed in case studies. Design: Original work. Setting: Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno. Methods: In 2014 there was a prospective, randomized, one-institution study. Patients underwent surgery including pelvic or pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical, uterine and ovarian cancer. The informed consent was signed. Octreotide was evaluated in relation to diagnosis, surgery (laparoscopy versus laparotomy), pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy, number of removed lymph nodes and their positivity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, albumin, BMI, number of days with drains postoperatively, number of days in hospital, blood loss during surgery, time of surgery, total number of drains placed into abdominal cavity. In follow up period, within 1 year after surgery, we searched for lymphocele, lymphedema of lower extremities and lymphatic ascites in relation to lymphorrhea. Results: 44 patients (9 cervical, 19 endometrial and 16 ovarian cancer) were enrolled in two statistically comparable randomized groups., Octreotide group", which paradoxically showed lymphorrhea of 4082 ml on average, (without 1992 ml, p = 0.001), needed drainage for more days (p = 0.001). The diagnosis had no influence on lymphorrhea in both groups (p = 0.966). The neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered (p = 0.026), the more lymph nodes were removed (p = 0.018), the more days the drainage was in place (p < 0.001), the bigger the lymphorrhea; no relationship between lymphorrhea and age (p = 0.631), albumin level (p = 0.584), BMI (p = 0.966) or number of positive nodes (p = 0.259), length of surgery (p = 0.206), blood loss (p = 0.494). Nor lymphedema (p = 0.404), nor lymphocele (p = 0.086), correlated with postoperative lymphorrhea. Lymphatic ascites was associated with lymphorrhea (p = 0.048). Conclusion: Octreotide did not reduce lymphorrhea and the incidence of lymphocele, lymphedema of lower extremities and lymphatic ascites within one year of follow-up period after surgery. According to our results, we do not recommend to administer the octreotide in oncogynecological patients after pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy.