Detailed Information on Publication Record
2017
Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues
FAKTOR, Jakub, Rita SUCHÁ, Vendula PÁRALOVÁ, Yansheng LIU, Pavel BOUCHAL et. al.Basic information
Original name
Comparison of targeted proteomics approaches for detecting and quantifying proteins derived from human cancer tissues
Authors
FAKTOR, Jakub (703 Slovakia), Rita SUCHÁ (203 Czech Republic), Vendula PÁRALOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Yansheng LIU (156 China) and Pavel BOUCHAL (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Proteomics, HOBOKEN, USA, Wiley, 2017, 1615-9853
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10609 Biochemical research methods
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.532
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/17:00095603
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000397390800006
Keywords in English
Cancer; MRM; SRM; p-SRM; SWATH; Tissue
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 30/3/2018 15:37, Ing. Nicole Zrilić
Abstract
V originále
Targeted mass spectrometry-based proteomics approaches enable the simultaneous and reproducible quantification of multiple protein analytes across numerous conditions in biology and clinical studies. These approaches involve e.g. selected reaction monitoring (SRM) typically conducted on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, its high-resolution variant named pseudo-SRM (p-SRM), carried out in a quadrupole coupled with an TOF analyzer (qTOF), and "sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra" (SWATH). Here we compared these methods in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), coefficient of variance (CV), fold change (FC), limit of detection and quantitation (LOD, LOQ). We have shown the highest S/N for p-SRM mode, followed by SRM and SWATH, demonstrating a trade-off between sensitivity and level of multiplexing for SRM, p-SRM, and SWATH. SRM was more sensitive than p-SRM based on determining their LOD and LOQ. Although SWATH has the worst S/N, it enables peptidemultiplexing with post-acquisition definition of the targets, leading to better proteome coverage. FC between breast tumors of different clinical-pathological characteristics were highly correlated (R-2>0.97) across three methods and consistent with the previous study on 96 tumor tissues. Our technical note presented here, therefore, confirmed that outputs of all the three methods were biologically relevant and highly applicable to cancer research.
Links
GA17-05957S, research and development project |
|