Podrobný výpis o publikaci

KIMMICH, Christian a Sergio VILLAMAYOR TOMAS. Assessing Action Situation Networks : A Configurational Perspective on Water and Energy Governance in Irrigation Systems. Water Economics and Policy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, roč. 5, č. 1, s. 1-29. ISSN 2382-624X. doi:10.1142/S2382624X18500054. 2019.

Další formáty: BibTeX LaTeX RIS

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1415203
AU  - Kimmich, Christian - Villamayor Tomas, Sergio
PY  - 2019
TI  - Assessing Action Situation Networks : A Configurational Perspective on Water and Energy Governance in Irrigation Systems
JF  - Water Economics and Policy
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
SP  - 1-29
EP  - 1-29
PB  - World Scientific Publishing Company
SN  - 2382624X
KW  - Network analysis
KW  - configurational analysis
KW  - institutional analysis and developmentframework
KW  - water–energy–food nexus
KW  - social–ecological system
KW  - Spain
KW  - India
UR  - https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2382624X18500054
L2  - https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2382624X18500054
N2  - The action situation is a core component of actor-centered institutional analysis of natural resource governance. Institutional analysis frameworks have been extended to observe multiple situations structured into networks. If further operationalized, this extension can improve policy diagnosis of human–environmental interactions. This paper proposes two complementary ways to move in that direction. First, we propose the use of qualitative configurational analysis and game theory to study the interactions between situations and assess the contribution of each to a desired outcome. Second, we draw on centrality measures to assess the benefits and risks of implementing policies that aim to change the equilibria in action situations. Both analytical strategies are applied to two cases involving irrigation and energy governance. In the Spanish case, centrality of the water allocation situation justifies a configuration of drought measures that also tackle cooperation in monitoring and infrastructure maintenance. In the Indian case, groundwater governance and adequate infrastructure capacity provision are necessary preconditions to enable coordinated technology adoption, which facilitates incentives for regulated irrigation. In both the cases, some action situations’ positive outcomes are necessary in every configuration to guarantee optimal equilibria in the network. In the context of energy-fed irrigation systems, the proposed analytical strategies permit integrating interactions between water use, energy use and food production decisions in policy diagnoses. The analysis can be extended to identify archetypes, network closure, as well as structural and functional connectivity of networks in social-ecological systems.
ER  -

Základní údaje
Originální název	Assessing Action Situation Networks : A Configurational Perspective on Water and Energy Governance in Irrigation Systems
Autoři	KIMMICH, Christian (276 Německo, garant, domácí) a Sergio VILLAMAYOR TOMAS (724 Španělsko).
Vydání	Water Economics and Policy, Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2019, 2382-624X.

Další údaje
Originální jazyk	angličtina
Typ výsledku	Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor	50900 5.9 Other social sciences
Stát vydavatele	Čína
Utajení	není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW	článek - open access
Kód RIV	RIV/00216224:14230/19:00108820
Organizační jednotka	Fakulta sociálních studií
Doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X18500054
UT WoS	000457297400003
Klíčová slova anglicky	Network analysis; configurational analysis; institutional analysis and developmentframework; water–energy–food nexus; social–ecological system; Spain; India
Štítky	rivok
Příznaky	Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil	Změnila: Mgr. Blanka Farkašová, učo 97333. Změněno: 25. 3. 2020 14:33.

Anotace
The action situation is a core component of actor-centered institutional analysis of natural resource governance. Institutional analysis frameworks have been extended to observe multiple situations structured into networks. If further operationalized, this extension can improve policy diagnosis of human–environmental interactions. This paper proposes two complementary ways to move in that direction. First, we propose the use of qualitative configurational analysis and game theory to study the interactions between situations and assess the contribution of each to a desired outcome. Second, we draw on centrality measures to assess the benefits and risks of implementing policies that aim to change the equilibria in action situations. Both analytical strategies are applied to two cases involving irrigation and energy governance. In the Spanish case, centrality of the water allocation situation justifies a configuration of drought measures that also tackle cooperation in monitoring and infrastructure maintenance. In the Indian case, groundwater governance and adequate infrastructure capacity provision are necessary preconditions to enable coordinated technology adoption, which facilitates incentives for regulated irrigation. In both the cases, some action situations’ positive outcomes are necessary in every configuration to guarantee optimal equilibria in the network. In the context of energy-fed irrigation systems, the proposed analytical strategies permit integrating interactions between water use, energy use and food production decisions in policy diagnoses. The analysis can be extended to identify archetypes, network closure, as well as structural and functional connectivity of networks in social-ecological systems.

Anotace

The action situation is a core component of actor-centered institutional analysis of natural resource governance. Institutional analysis frameworks have been extended to observe multiple situations structured into networks. If further operationalized, this extension can improve policy diagnosis of human–environmental interactions. This paper proposes two complementary ways to move in that direction. First, we propose the use of qualitative configurational analysis and game theory to study the interactions between situations and assess the contribution of each to a desired outcome. Second, we draw on centrality measures to assess the benefits and risks of implementing policies that aim to change the equilibria in action situations. Both analytical strategies are applied to two cases involving irrigation and energy governance. In the Spanish case, centrality of the water allocation situation justifies a configuration of drought measures that also tackle cooperation in monitoring and infrastructure maintenance. In the Indian case, groundwater governance and adequate infrastructure capacity provision are necessary preconditions to enable coordinated technology adoption, which facilitates incentives for regulated irrigation. In both the cases, some action situations’ positive outcomes are necessary in every configuration to guarantee optimal equilibria in the network. In the context of energy-fed irrigation systems, the proposed analytical strategies permit integrating interactions between water use, energy use and food production decisions in policy diagnoses. The analysis can be extended to identify archetypes, network closure, as well as structural and functional connectivity of networks in social-ecological systems.