RASZKOVÁ, Soňa and Viktorie KLÍMOVÁ. Indirect R&D Support as a Tool for Enhancing Innovations: the Case of the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. In Staníčková, M., Melecký, L., Kovářová, E., Dvoroková, K. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration. Ostrava: VŠB - Technická univerzita, 2018, p. 1225-1232. ISBN 978-80-248-4169-4.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Indirect R&D Support as a Tool for Enhancing Innovations: the Case of the Czech Republic and the Netherlands
Authors RASZKOVÁ, Soňa (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Viktorie KLÍMOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution).
Edition Ostrava, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on European Integration, p. 1225-1232, 8 pp. 2018.
Publisher VŠB - Technická univerzita
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Proceedings paper
Field of Study 50202 Applied Economics, Econometrics
Country of publisher Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form printed version "print"
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14560/18:00102734
Organization unit Faculty of Economics and Administration
ISBN 978-80-248-4169-4
ISSN 2571-029X
UT WoS 000462093400138
Keywords in English Czech Republic; European research policy; indirect R&D support; Netherlands; tax incentives
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: doc. Ing. Viktorie Klímová, Ph.D., učo 22594. Changed: 10/4/2019 10:09.
Abstract
The main advantage of the indirect support for research and development is that this type of support is not selective and each company that meets the legal requirements can use it for financing of its research and innovation activities. Thus, this support is more compatible with economic competition. It also represents one of the means to reach the Europe 2020 target in the field of research and development and most of the EU countries use it. This paper deals with indirect support for R&D that is used for promotion of innovation activities in the Czech Republic and the Netherlands. The aims of the article are to compare indirect R&D support in both countries, to provide new empirical evidence on using this type of support, and to find some inspiration for the Czech Republic from the Dutch example. It has been observed that this instrument is used in different ways in both analysed countries. The Netherlands has more experience with tax incentives and the impact of the support is regularly evaluated.
Links
MUNI/A/0921/2017, interní kód MUName: Inovační politika a rozvoj regionálních inovačních systémů (Acronym: IPORIS)
Investor: Masaryk University, Category A
PrintDisplayed: 19/7/2024 12:27