Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
SLN biopsy in cervical cancer patients with tumors larger than 2 cm and 4 cm
DOSTALEK, L., M. ZIKAN, D. FISCHEROVA, R. KOCIAN, A. GERMANOVA et. al.Basic information
Original name
SLN biopsy in cervical cancer patients with tumors larger than 2 cm and 4 cm
Authors
DOSTALEK, L. (203 Czech Republic), M. ZIKAN (203 Czech Republic), D. FISCHEROVA (203 Czech Republic), R. KOCIAN (203 Czech Republic), A. GERMANOVA (203 Czech Republic), F. FRUHAUF (203 Czech Republic), Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), J. SLAMA (203 Czech Republic), P. DUNDR (203 Czech Republic), K. NEMEJCOVA (203 Czech Republic) and D. CIBULA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Gynecologic Oncology, SAN DIEGO, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2018, 0090-8258
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 4.393
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00102807
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000428005300005
Keywords in English
Cervical cancer; Bulky; Sentinel lymph node; False negative rate; Detection rate; Sensitivity
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 10/2/2019 19:41, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the detection rate, false-negative rate and sensitivity of SLN in LN staging in tumors over 2 cm on a large cohort of patients. Methods. Data from patients with stages pT1a - pT2 cervical cancer who underwent surgical treatment, including SLN biopsy followed by systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, were retrospectively analyzed. A combined technique with blue dye and radiocolloid was modified in larger tumors to inject the tracer into the residual cervical stroma. Results. The study included 350 patients with stages pTla - pT2. Macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were found in 10%, 8%, and 4% of cases. Bilateral detection rate was similar in subgroups with tumors < 2 cm, 2-3.9 cm, and >= 4 cm (79%, 83%, 76%) (P = 0.460). There were only two cases with false-negative SLN ultrastaging for pelvic IN status among those with bilateral SLN detection. The false negative rate was very low in all three subgroups of different tumor sizes (0.9%, 0.9%, and 0.0%; P = 0.999). Sensitivity reached 96% in the whole group and was high in all three groups (93%, 93%, 100%; P = 0.510). Conclusions. If the tracer application technique is adjusted in larger tumors, SIN biopsy can be equally reliable in pelvic IN staging in tumors smaller and larger than 2 cm. The bilateral detection rate and false negative rate did not differ in subgroups of patients with tumors < 2 cm, 2-3.9 cm, and cm.