SAUSSINE, C., S. ANDONIAN, Dalibor PACÍK, M. POPIOLEK, A. CELIA, N. BUCHHOLZ, P. SOUNTOULIDES, B. PETRUT and Jean J.M.C.H. DE LA ROSETTE. Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study. Journal of endourology. New York: Mary Ann Liebert Inc., 2018, vol. 32, No 4, p. 297-303. ISSN 0892-7790. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0629.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Worldwide Use of Antiretropulsive Techniques: Observations from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study
Authors SAUSSINE, C. (250 France), S. ANDONIAN (124 Canada), Dalibor PACÍK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), M. POPIOLEK (752 Sweden), A. CELIA (380 Italy), N. BUCHHOLZ (784 United Arab Emirates), P. SOUNTOULIDES (300 Greece), B. PETRUT (642 Romania) and Jean J.M.C.H. DE LA ROSETTE (528 Netherlands, guarantor).
Edition Journal of endourology. New York, Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 2018, 0892-7790.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30217 Urology and nephrology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 2.267
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00102913
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0629
UT WoS 000422642200001
Keywords in English antiretropulsion; migration; ureteroscopy; stone cone; Ntrap; basket
Tags 14110225, EL OK, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 11/2/2019 16:03.
Abstract
Introduction: Retropulsion, defined as unintended migration of a stone under the influence of the fragmentation device in ureteroscopy (URS) procedures, occurs in 2% to 60% of the cases. Antiretropulsive devices (ARDs) have been studied in experimental and small clinical studies. The current study aims at describing the worldwide usage of ARD and the outcomes related to their usage. Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society URS Global Study enrolled 11,885 patients who underwent URS and stone fragmentation for ureteral and/or renal stones. Of the 11,885 treated patients, 9877 were treated for ureteral stones, and data were available on stone migration and ARD use. Results: Of all procedures, 14.5% were performed with the use of an ARD. Less stone migration (-2.0%; p=0.050), higher stone-free rates (SFRs) (2.8%; p<0.001), and shorter length of stay (-4.7%; p=0.001) were observed in the antiretropulsive group. Conclusions: When an ARD is used during URS, less migration, higher SFRs, and shorter length of hospital stay are observed. This effect is independent from baseline differences and corrected for other treatment characteristics.
PrintDisplayed: 25/7/2024 21:58