Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inbook{1420758,
author = {Selucká, Markéta and Grochová, Martina and Komendová, Jana},
address = {Switzerland},
booktitle = {Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Anti-discrimination Law. Challenges and Innovative Tools},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_9},
editor = {Marie Mercat-Bruns, David B. Oppenheimer, Cady Sartorius},
keywords = {Anti-discrimination Law},
howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
language = {eng},
location = {Switzerland},
isbn = {978-3-319-90067-4},
pages = {153-173},
publisher = {Springer International Publishing AG},
title = {Czech Republic},
url = {https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319900674},
year = {2018}
}
TY - CHAP
ID - 1420758
AU - Selucká, Markéta - Grochová, Martina - Komendová, Jana
PY - 2018
TI - Czech Republic
VL - Ius Comparatum- Global Studies in Comparative Law
PB - Springer International Publishing AG
CY - Switzerland
SN - 9783319900674
KW - Anti-discrimination Law
UR - https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319900674
L2 - https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319900674
N2 - The Czech Constitutional Court in its decision from 6 June 2006, file no. Pl. ÚS 42/04, rules that the constitutional principle of equality in rights belongs to those fundamental human rights that constitute a system of values of modern democratic societies. The principle of equality is a legally philosophical postulate at the level of positive law guaranteed by prohibition of discrimination. Equality is not a changeless category as far as it goes through development especially in the area of political and social rights. Also, the international documents about human rights and numerous decisions of international control bodies emanate from the fact that not every unequal treatment with different subjects can be qualified as violation of the principle of equality, or accordingly, as illicit discrimination of ones in comparisonwith others. Violation of this principle requires several conditions be met: different subjects being in the same or comparable situation are treated in a different manner unless there are any objective and reasonable reasons for applying a different approach. Herein it can be added that the European Court of Human Rights similarly states that difference in treatment among persons being in analogical or comparable situations is discriminatory unless it has any objective and reasonable justification.
ER -
SELUCKÁ, Markéta, Martina GROCHOVÁ a Jana KOMENDOVÁ. Czech Republic. In Marie Mercat-Bruns, David B. Oppenheimer, Cady Sartorius. \textit{Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Anti-discrimination Law. Challenges and Innovative Tools}. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. s.~153-173. Ius Comparatum- Global Studies in Comparative Law. ISBN~978-3-319-90067-4. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1\_{}9.
|
