2018
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
JELINEK, T.; V. MAISNAR; Luděk POUR; I. SPICKA; J. MINARIK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
Authors
JELINEK, T. (203 Czech Republic); V. MAISNAR (203 Czech Republic); Luděk POUR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); I. SPICKA (203 Czech Republic); J. MINARIK (203 Czech Republic); E. GREGORA (203 Czech Republic); P. KESSLER (203 Czech Republic); M. SYKORA (203 Czech Republic); H. FRANKOVA (203 Czech Republic); D. ADAMOVA (203 Czech Republic); M. WROBEL (203 Czech Republic); P. MIKULA (203 Czech Republic); Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); J. DIELS (56 Belgium); X. GATOPOULOU (300 Greece); S. VESELA (203 Czech Republic); H. BESSON (56 Belgium); Lucie BROŽOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); T. ITO (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) and R. HAJEK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Current medical research and opinion, Oxon, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 0300-7995
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30218 General and internal medicine
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.345
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103214
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000430209400003
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85042106038
Keywords in English
Czech Republic; multiple myeloma; daratumumab; matching adjusted indirect comparison; treatment outcomes
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 26/3/2019 10:25, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
In the original language
Objectives: We conducted an adjusted comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for daratumumab monotherapy versus standard of care, as observed in a real-world historical cohort of heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients from Czech Republic. Methods: Using longitudinal chart data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group, patient-level data from the RMG was pooled with pivotal daratumumab monotherapy studies (GEN501 and SIRIUS; 16mg/kg). Results: From the RMG database, we identified 972 treatment lines in 463 patients previously treated with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. Treatment initiation dates for RMG patients were between March 2006 and March 2015. The most frequently used treatment regimens were lenalidomide-based regimens (33.4%), chemotherapy (18.1%), bortezomib-based regimens (13.6%), thalidomide-based regimens (8.0%), and bortezomib plus thalidomide (5.3%). Few patients were treated with carfilzomib-based regimens (2.5%) and pomalidomide-based regimens (2.4%). Median observed PFS for daratumumab and the RMG cohort was 4.0 and 5.8 months (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.39), respectively, and unadjusted median OS was 20.1 and 11.9 months (unadjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made using patient-level data. The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for PFS and OS for daratumumab versus the RMG cohort were 0.79 (0.56-1.12; p=.192) and 0.33 (0.21-0.52; p<.001), respectively. Conclusions: Adjusted comparisons between trial data and historical cohorts can provide useful insights to clinicians and reimbursement decision makers on relative treatment efficacies in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies for daratumumab monotherapy.