Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
JELINEK, T., V. MAISNAR, Luděk POUR, I. SPICKA, J. MINARIK et. al.Basic information
Original name
Adjusted comparison of daratumumab monotherapy versus real-world historical control data from the Czech Republic in heavily pretreated and highly refractory multiple myeloma patients
Authors
JELINEK, T. (203 Czech Republic), V. MAISNAR (203 Czech Republic), Luděk POUR (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), I. SPICKA (203 Czech Republic), J. MINARIK (203 Czech Republic), E. GREGORA (203 Czech Republic), P. KESSLER (203 Czech Republic), M. SYKORA (203 Czech Republic), H. FRANKOVA (203 Czech Republic), D. ADAMOVA (203 Czech Republic), M. WROBEL (203 Czech Republic), P. MIKULA (203 Czech Republic), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), J. DIELS (56 Belgium), X. GATOPOULOU (300 Greece), S. VESELA (203 Czech Republic), H. BESSON (56 Belgium), Lucie BROŽOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), T. ITO (826 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) and R. HAJEK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor)
Edition
Current medical research and opinion, Oxon, Taylor & Francis, 2018, 0300-7995
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30218 General and internal medicine
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 2.345
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103214
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000430209400003
Keywords in English
Czech Republic; multiple myeloma; daratumumab; matching adjusted indirect comparison; treatment outcomes
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 26/3/2019 10:25, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Objectives: We conducted an adjusted comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for daratumumab monotherapy versus standard of care, as observed in a real-world historical cohort of heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients from Czech Republic. Methods: Using longitudinal chart data from the Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG) of the Czech Myeloma Group, patient-level data from the RMG was pooled with pivotal daratumumab monotherapy studies (GEN501 and SIRIUS; 16mg/kg). Results: From the RMG database, we identified 972 treatment lines in 463 patients previously treated with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. Treatment initiation dates for RMG patients were between March 2006 and March 2015. The most frequently used treatment regimens were lenalidomide-based regimens (33.4%), chemotherapy (18.1%), bortezomib-based regimens (13.6%), thalidomide-based regimens (8.0%), and bortezomib plus thalidomide (5.3%). Few patients were treated with carfilzomib-based regimens (2.5%) and pomalidomide-based regimens (2.4%). Median observed PFS for daratumumab and the RMG cohort was 4.0 and 5.8 months (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.39), respectively, and unadjusted median OS was 20.1 and 11.9 months (unadjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.78), respectively. Statistical adjustments for differences in baseline characteristics were made using patient-level data. The adjusted HRs (95% CI) for PFS and OS for daratumumab versus the RMG cohort were 0.79 (0.56-1.12; p=.192) and 0.33 (0.21-0.52; p<.001), respectively. Conclusions: Adjusted comparisons between trial data and historical cohorts can provide useful insights to clinicians and reimbursement decision makers on relative treatment efficacies in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies for daratumumab monotherapy.