Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results?
ŠPAČEK, DavidBasic information
Original name
Public Administration Reform in Czechia after 2000 – Ambitious Strategies and Modest Results?
Authors
ŠPAČEK, David (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, NISPAcee - Network of Institutes and Schools of Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe, 2018, 1337-9038
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
50902 Social sciences, interdisciplinary
Country of publisher
Slovakia
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14560/18:00103348
Organization unit
Faculty of Economics and Administration
UT WoS
000439160600007
Keywords in English
public administration reform; Czechia; civil service; e-government; quality management
Tags
Reviewed
Změněno: 8/10/2022 19:11, Mgr. Pavlína Kurková
Abstract
V originále
The paper summarizes and discusses the main topics, developments and issues of Czech administrative reform, based on desk research, secondary literature on developments of administrative reform in the country and input obtained through mapping and analyzing ESF/ESIF support and interviews with employees of central bodies that are responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the use of ESF/ESIF support. It is based on findings prepared within the project European Public Administration Country Knowledge (EUPACK) that focused on researching dynamics of public administration in EU member states and the contribution of external support to improving public administration quality. The research indicates that partial results have been accomplished particularly in the following areas: openness and transparency, quality management implementation (by municipalities and regions) and e-government. Civil-service legislation has been consolidated rather recently, yet has changed various times, and this undermines every effort to evaluate its effects. A national PA evaluation system is being developed by the Ministry of the Interior but focuses (similarly to PA strategies and related operational programmes) on input indicators. This raises questions about possibilities to evaluate actual quality in PA and results of projects implemented within PA reforms.