2018
Case Law and its Binding Effect in the System of Formal Sources of Law
GEALFOW, John AltairBasic information
Original name
Case Law and its Binding Effect in the System of Formal Sources of Law
Name in Czech
Judikatura a její závaznost v systému formálních pramenů práva
Authors
GEALFOW, John Altair (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution)
Edition
The Journal of the University of Latvia (Juridiskā zinātne / Law), University of Latvia, 2018, 1691-7677
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
50501 Law
Country of publisher
Latvia
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14220/18:00103538
Organization unit
Faculty of Law
Keywords (in Czech)
závaznost soudních rozhodnutí; princip právní jistoty; předvídatelnost soudních rozhodnutí; formální prameny práva; judikatura; autonomní prameny práva; precedenční závaznost rozhodnutí; právní stát
Keywords in English
binding effect of judicial decisions; principle of legal certainty; predictability of judicial decisions; formal sources of law; case law; autonomy of sources of law; precedential binding effect; legal state; rule of law
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 10/7/2020 14:10, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Abstract
V originále
The author proposes changes to the traditional concept of formal sources of law. This concept originates in the 18th century, but it fails in adapting to the development of the law, especially in relation to principles of legal certainty and predictability of legal decisions. The definition of formal sources of law is also vague and unclear and it brings more problems than it offers solutions and insight. To replace it, the author offers a new distinction – based on the criterion of autonomy of the sources of law. To support his arguments, the author compares the status of court decisions in common law and civil law systems but also focuses on the difference between individual countries belonging to the civil law system. The comparative criteria are mainly focusing on the nature and strength of the binding effect of the case law for the lower courts, but also on institutional aspects within the court hierarchy, e.g. if a judge can be liable in any way for ignoring a source of law.