I Don't Like It Unless It's for Me: Experimental Test of Voters’ Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics

TÓTH, Michal, Miroslav NEMČOK a Lenka HRBKOVÁ. I Don't Like It Unless It's for Me: Experimental Test of Voters’ Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics. In ECPR General conference, Hamburg, 2018. 2018.

Základní údaje

• Originální název: I Don't Like It Unless It's for Me: Experimental Test of Voters’ Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics
• Název anglicky: I Don't Like It Unless It's for Me: Experimental Test of Voters’ Perception of Pork-Barrel Politics
• Autoři: TÓTH, Michal, Miroslav NEMČOK a Lenka HRBKOVÁ.
• Vydání: ECPR General conference, Hamburg, 2018. 2018.

Další údaje

• Typ výsledku: Prezentace na konferencích
• Utajení: není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
• WWW: URL
• Klíčová slova anglicky: Representation, Corruption, Experimental Design, Public Opinion, Voting Behaviour
• Příznaky: Mezinárodní význam

Anotace

Effective and fair redistribution of public resources is seen as one of the key elements of well-functioning democracy. In the real world, however, it turns out that resources are often allocated neither effectively nor equitably, and that the impartial allocation of public finances serves as a tool for securing votes and reelection [Dahlberg and Johansson 2002; Denemark 2000; Evans 2004]. The existing research shows that politicians strive to provide a favorable political decision and they are intentionally giving more money to regions that are represented by their political allies with the aim to influence the local electoral behavior [Denemark 2000; Costa-I-Font 2003; Gaunt 1999; Solle-Olle a Sorribas-Navarro 2008, Spáč 2016]. The literature provides compelling evidence for pork-barrel patterns present in distributive politics. However, very little is known about voters’ perception of this inherently unfair effort to ensure their votes. Existing findings are not only limited, but also contradictory – it appears that voters can perceive such strategy both in positive and negative way [Braidwood 2015, Bøggild 2016], but it is not clear what stands behind such ambiguity. In order to find out more about factors influencing the voters' perceptions of pork-barrel politics, we design an experiment adjusting various attributes of politically motivated distribution of public resources and study how they affect the level of trust and evaluation of responsible political actor(s). We assume that the support for a decision-maker responsible for the redistribution is highly conditioned by the level at which the finances are reallocated, the subjectively perceived salience of the policy, and the way the information about redistribution is framed. We also believe that the psychological mechanism of the perception of unfair redistribution of public resources and the sensitivity to partiality is deeply rooted in the sociopolitical and cultural context. Given the fact that existing studies are conducted in the regions with long democratic tradition, we decided to contribute to the current findings with the patterns present in the countries of Central Europe for which a higher degree of clientelism and corruption is characteristic.

Návaznosti

• GA18-16928S, projekt VaV: Název: Distributivní politika ve střední Evropě

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Distributivní politika ve střední Evropě