Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inbook{1437120,
author = {DontchevaandNavrátilová, Olga},
address = {Amsterdam/Philadelphia},
booktitle = {Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.11don},
edition = {1},
editor = {Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu},
keywords = {persuasion; academic discourse; genre; book reviews; cross-cultural variation; evaluative acts; citations; personal pronouns; rhetorical moves},
howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
language = {eng},
location = {Amsterdam/Philadelphia},
isbn = {978-90-272-0138-6},
pages = {227-257},
publisher = {John Benjamins},
title = {Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews},
url = {https://benjamins.com/catalog/dapsac.79.11don},
year = {2018}
}
TY - CHAP
ID - 1437120
AU - Dontcheva-Navrátilová, Olga
PY - 2018
TI - Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews
VL - Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, vol.79
PB - John Benjamins
CY - Amsterdam/Philadelphia
SN - 9789027201386
KW - persuasion
KW - academic discourse
KW - genre
KW - book reviews
KW - cross-cultural variation
KW - evaluative acts
KW - citations
KW - personal pronouns
KW - rhetorical moves
UR - https://benjamins.com/catalog/dapsac.79.11don
L2 - https://benjamins.com/catalog/dapsac.79.11don
N2 - This chapter studies persuasion in academic book reviews from a cross-cultural perspective. After discussing the rhetorical structure of book reviews, the study explores the strategic means used by the authors of reviews to represent themselves as expert members of the disciplinary community, show authorial involvement, and open a dialogic space for the negotiation of their opinions and views. The analysis of citation practices, personal structures, and evaluation acts is carried out on a corpus of book reviews published in the linguistics journals Journal of English for Academic Purposes and Slovo a Slovesnost. The findings indicate that while both Anglophone and Czech linguists exploit these linguistic means for persuasive purposes, there is cross-cultural variation in their rate of occurrence and rhetorical functions.
ER -
DONTCHEVA-NAVRÁTILOVÁ, Olga. Persuasion in academic discourse: Cross-cultural variation in Anglophone and Czech academic book reviews. In Jana Pelclová and Wei-lun Lu. \textit{Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives}. 1st ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2018, p.~227-257. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, vol.79. ISBN~978-90-272-0138-6. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.11don.
|
