Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1440877,
author = {Gervais, Will M and van Elk, Michiel and Xygalatas, Dimitrios and McKay, Ryan Thomas and Aveyard, Mark and Buchtel, Emma E and DarandNimrod, Ilan and Kundtová Klocová, Eva and Ramsay, Jonathan E and Riekki, Tapani and SvedholmandHäkkinen, Annika M and Bulbulia, Joseph},
article_number = {3},
keywords = {atheism; cultural learning; dual process cognition; religious cognition; replicability; WEIRD people; culture},
language = {eng},
issn = {1930-2975},
journal = {Judgment and Decision Making},
title = {Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?},
url = {http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf},
volume = {13},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1440877
AU - Gervais, Will M - van Elk, Michiel - Xygalatas, Dimitrios - McKay, Ryan Thomas - Aveyard, Mark - Buchtel, Emma E - Dar-Nimrod, Ilan - Kundtová Klocová, Eva - Ramsay, Jonathan E - Riekki, Tapani - Svedholm-Häkkinen, Annika M - Bulbulia, Joseph
PY - 2018
TI - Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?
JF - Judgment and Decision Making
VL - 13
IS - 3
SP - 268-274
EP - 268-274
PB - Society for Judgment and Decision Making
SN - 19302975
KW - atheism
KW - cultural learning
KW - dual process cognition
KW - religious cognition
KW - replicability
KW - WEIRD people
KW - culture
UR - http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf
L2 - http://journal.sjdm.org/18/18228/jdm18228.pdf
N2 - Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.
ER -
GERVAIS, Will M, Michiel VAN ELK, Dimitrios XYGALATAS, Ryan Thomas MCKAY, Mark AVEYARD, Emma E BUCHTEL, Ilan DAR-NIMROD, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, Jonathan E RAMSAY, Tapani RIEKKI, Annika M SVEDHOLM-HÄKKINEN and Joseph BULBULIA. Analytic atheism : A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon? \textit{Judgment and Decision Making}. Society for Judgment and Decision Making, 2018, vol.~13, No~3, p.~268-274. ISSN~1930-2975.
|
