SZTURZ, Petr, Kristien WOUTERS, Naomi KIYOTA, Makoto TAHARA, Kumar PRABHASH, Vanita NORONHA, David ADELSTEIN and Jan B. VERMORKEN. Altered fractionation radiotherapy combined with concurrent low-dose or high-dose cisplatin in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Oral oncology. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018, vol. 76, JAN 2018, p. 52-60. ISSN 1368-8375. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.11.025.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Altered fractionation radiotherapy combined with concurrent low-dose or high-dose cisplatin in head and neck cancer: A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
Authors SZTURZ, Petr (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Kristien WOUTERS (56 Belgium), Naomi KIYOTA (392 Japan), Makoto TAHARA (392 Japan), Kumar PRABHASH (356 India), Vanita NORONHA (356 India), David ADELSTEIN (840 United States of America) and Jan B. VERMORKEN (56 Belgium).
Edition Oral oncology, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, 2018, 1368-8375.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30204 Oncology
Country of publisher Netherlands
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.730
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00103957
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.11.025
UT WoS 000418885000008
Keywords in English Head and neck cancer; Concurrent chemoradiotherapy; Meta-analysis; Radiotherapy dose fractionation; Cisplatin; Survival
Tags 14110212, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 9/2/2019 20:15.
Abstract
Objectives: Altered fractionation radiotherapy and concomitant chemoradiotherapy represent commonly used intensification strategies in the management of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN). This meta-analysis compares compliance, safety, and efficacy between two single-agent cisplatin schedules given concurrently with altered fractionation radiotherapy. Methods: We systematically searched for prospective trials of patients with LA-SCCHN who received post-operative or definitive altered fractionation concurrent chemoradiotherapy. High-dose cisplatin once every three to four weeks (100 mg/m(2), 2 doses) was compared with a weekly low-dose protocol (<= 50 mg/m2, >= 4 doses). The primary outcome was overall survival. The secondary endpoints comprised treatment adherence, acute and late toxicities, and objective response rate. Results: Twelve studies with 1373 patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy were included. Compared to the weekly low-dose cisplatin regimen, the three-to four-weekly high-dose cisplatin regimen improved overall survival (p = .0185), was more compliant with respect to receiving all planned cycles of cisplatin (71% versus 95%, p = .0353), and demonstrated less complications in terms of severe (grade 3-4) acute mucositis and/or stomatitis (75% versus 40%, p =. 0202) and constipation (8% versus 1%, p = .0066), toxic deaths (4%, versus 1%, p = .0168), 30-day mortality (8% versus 3%, p = .0154), and severe late subcutaneous fibrosis (21% versus 2%, p < .0001). Overall and complete response rates were similar between both chemotherapy schedules. Conclusion: In chemoradiotherapy incorporating altered fractionation, two cycles of high-dose cisplatin with a three to four week interval are superior to weekly low-dose schedules. Further studies should identify those who might derive the greatest benefit from this intensified approach.
PrintDisplayed: 2/7/2024 12:33