PUTTEN, Louis J. van der, Nicole C. M. VISSER, Ko van de VIJVER, Maria SANTACANA, Peter BRONSERT, Johan BULTEN, Marc HIRSCHFELD, Eva COLAS, Antonio GIL-MORENO, Angel GARCIA, Gemma MANCEBO, Fransesca ALAMEDA, Jone TROVIK, Reidun K. KOPPERUD, Jutta HUVILA, Stefanie SCHRAUWEN, Martin KOSKAS, Francine WALKER, Vít WEINBERGER, Luboš MINÁŘ, Eva JANDÁKOVÁ, Marc P. L. M. SNIJDERS, Sa VAN DEN BERG-VAN ERP, Xavier MATIAS-GUIU, Helga B. SALVESEN, Henrica M. J. WERNER, Frederic AMANT, Leon F. A. G. MASSUGER and Johanna M. A. PIJNENBORG. Added Value of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression to Histology-Based Endometrial Carcinoma Recurrence Prediction Models: An ENITEC Collaboration Study. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2018, vol. 28, No 3, p. 514-523. ISSN 1048-891X. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001187.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name Added Value of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression to Histology-Based Endometrial Carcinoma Recurrence Prediction Models: An ENITEC Collaboration Study
Authors PUTTEN, Louis J. van der (528 Netherlands, guarantor), Nicole C. M. VISSER (528 Netherlands), Ko van de VIJVER (528 Netherlands), Maria SANTACANA (724 Spain), Peter BRONSERT (276 Germany), Johan BULTEN (528 Netherlands), Marc HIRSCHFELD (276 Germany), Eva COLAS (724 Spain), Antonio GIL-MORENO (724 Spain), Angel GARCIA (724 Spain), Gemma MANCEBO (724 Spain), Fransesca ALAMEDA (724 Spain), Jone TROVIK (578 Norway), Reidun K. KOPPERUD (578 Norway), Jutta HUVILA (246 Finland), Stefanie SCHRAUWEN (56 Belgium), Martin KOSKAS (250 France), Francine WALKER (250 France), Vít WEINBERGER (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Luboš MINÁŘ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Eva JANDÁKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Marc P. L. M. SNIJDERS (528 Netherlands), Sa VAN DEN BERG-VAN ERP (528 Netherlands), Xavier MATIAS-GUIU (724 Spain), Helga B. SALVESEN (578 Norway), Henrica M. J. WERNER (578 Norway), Frederic AMANT (56 Belgium), Leon F. A. G. MASSUGER (528 Netherlands) and Johanna M. A. PIJNENBORG (528 Netherlands).
Edition International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2018, 1048-891X.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 1.746
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104087
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000001187
UT WoS 000426550300015
Keywords in English Endometrial carcinoma; Endometrioid; Nonendometrioid; Estrogen receptor; Progesteron receptor; L1CAM; Prognosis; Immunohistochemistry
Tags 14110230, 14110411, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 9/2/2019 19:59.
Abstract
Objectives Endometrial carcinoma mortality is mainly caused by recurrent disease, and various immunohistochemical markers to predict recurrences have been studied. Loss of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and the presence of the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) are promising markers, but their combined value has not been studied. Materials and Methods Expression of ER, PR, and L1CAM was immunohistochemically determined in 293 endometrial carcinomas from 11 collaborating European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer centers. Estrogen receptor, PR, or L1CAM staining was considered positive or negative when expressed by greater than or equal to 10% or less than 10% of the tumor cells, respectively. The association between these markers and clinicopathological markers, and their combined value in predicting survival were calculated, both in the entire cohort and in a selected groups of stage I endometrioid and low-risk stage I endometrioid carcinomas. Results Estrogen receptor and PR were negative in 19% and 28% of the cases, respectively, and L1CAM was positive in 18%. All 3 were associated with advanced stage, high-grade, nonendometrioid histology, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and reduced disease-free survival. Only advanced stage, loss of PR, and LVSI were associated with reduced disease-free survival in multivariate analysis. A prognostic model including these 3 markers was superior to 1 including only the 3 immunohistochemical markers, which was superior to the traditional model. In both the stage I endometrioid and the low-risk stage I endometrioid groups, only loss of PR was associated with reduced disease-free survival. Conclusions Loss of ER and PR, and the presence of L1CAM are associated with high risk characteristics, and loss of PR is the strongest predictor of recurrent disease. Although a combination of these 3 markers is slightly superior to the traditional histological markers, a prognostic model including stage, PR expression, and LVSI is the most promising model in the identification of high risk carcinomas. In the stage I endometrioid carcinomas, PR immunohistochemistry appears to be of additional value in predicting recurrences.
PrintDisplayed: 25/7/2024 15:05