Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
Verification of Survival Predictors in Elderly Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome from Outpatient Clinical Practice
KADLČKOVÁ, Eva, Peter ROHOŇ, Tomáš FÜRST, Libor ČERVINEK, Andrea JONÁŠOVÁ et. al.Basic information
Original name
Verification of Survival Predictors in Elderly Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome from Outpatient Clinical Practice
Authors
KADLČKOVÁ, Eva (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Peter ROHOŇ (203 Czech Republic), Tomáš FÜRST (203 Czech Republic), Libor ČERVINEK (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Andrea JONÁŠOVÁ (203 Czech Republic), Tomáš ŠÁLEK (203 Czech Republic), Jiří TESAŘ (203 Czech Republic) and Yvetta STAVAŘOVÁ (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, TAIPEI, ELSEVIER TAIWAN, 2018, 1873-9598
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30227 Geriatrics and gerontology
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 0.933
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104088
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000428286500007
Keywords in English
chelation therapy; myelodysplastic syndrome; prognostic scoring system; transfusion
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/2/2019 15:55, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Background: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal disorder affecting older persons. We aimed to analyze the effectiveness of the scoring systems and of the number of received red blood cell (RBC) units in predicting survival. Methods: The study included an unselected group of 73 patients with MDS who were diagnosed and treated in a single hospital over a period of 12 years. International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), revised IPSS (IPSS-R), WHO-Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), Charlson Age-Comorbidity Index (CACI), and impact of performance status (PS) on overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were tested. The follow-up of received RBC units was conducted. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 69.5 years, the median CACI was 3.0. The median survival times of the group were 7.04 and 2.78 years for OS and EFS, respectively. The concordance values of the IPSS, IPSS-R and WPSS are 0.812, 0.892 and 0.889 for OS; 0.785, 0.847 and 0.827 for EFS. The comorbidity index and PS were the only auxiliary criteria when determining the risk and selecting the therapeutic approach in MDS patients. In transfusion-dependent unchelated patients, both OS and EFS were negatively influenced by both higher ferritin levels and the numbers of RBC units; however, the risk does not continue to increase after more than 20 RBC units are administered. Conclusions: IPSS-R is best suited as a predictor of survival. CACI and PS present auxiliary criteria for determining the risk. Number of received RBC units was detected as a significant predictor of survival. Copyright (c) 2017, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC.