Detailed Information on Publication Record
2018
The optimal bowel preparation intervals before colonoscopy: A randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions
KOJECKY, Vladimir, Jan MATOUS, Radan KEIL, Milan DASTYCH, Zdena ZADOROVA et. al.Basic information
Original name
The optimal bowel preparation intervals before colonoscopy: A randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions
Authors
KOJECKY, Vladimir (203 Czech Republic), Jan MATOUS (203 Czech Republic), Radan KEIL (203 Czech Republic), Milan DASTYCH (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Zdena ZADOROVA (203 Czech Republic), Michal VARGA (203 Czech Republic), Radek KROUPA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří DOLINA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Miroslav MISUREC (203 Czech Republic), Aleš HEP (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Martin GRIVA (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018, 1590-8658
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
30219 Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.037
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104089
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000428631100009
Keywords in English
Ascorbic acid; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Sodium picosulfate
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 11/2/2019 14:15, Soňa Böhmová
Abstract
V originále
Background & aims: The optimal duration of bowel preparation has only been assessed for polyethylene glycol (PEG). The aim of the study was to determine the intervals for achieving a satisfactory quality/tolerability of the preparation using PEG/ascorbic acid (PEGA) and sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (SPMC), and to compare them with 4L of PEG. Methods: A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, multicentre study. The 612 outpatients referred to a colonoscopy, were prepared using PEG, SPMC, PEGA. The quality, tolerability, duration of the preparation, and the interval from the end of the preparation to the colonoscopy was assessed. Results: Optimum duration of the preparation was similar for both PEG and SPMC (>= 7.3 vs. >= 8.8 h, overall >= 8.4 h). Optimum interval to the colonoscopy was <= 11.8 h and did not differ between preparations (PEG, PEGA <= 11.8, SPMC <= 13.3 h). These times were the only predictors for a satisfactory preparation. The tolerability depends on the product type (SPMC) only. Timing of the preparation or the other factors had no impact on tolerability. Conclusion: The optimum intervals for bowel preparation are identical for all preparations. Satisfactory preparation is achived at the preparation length >= 8.4 h and the time to colonoscopy <= 11.8 h.