KOJECKY, Vladimir, Jan MATOUS, Radan KEIL, Milan DASTYCH, Zdena ZADOROVA, Michal VARGA, Radek KROUPA, Jiří DOLINA, Miroslav MISUREC, Aleš HEP and Martin GRIVA. The optimal bowel preparation intervals before colonoscopy: A randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. NEW YORK: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018, vol. 50, No 3, p. 271-276. ISSN 1590-8658. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.10.010.
Other formats:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Basic information
Original name The optimal bowel preparation intervals before colonoscopy: A randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions
Authors KOJECKY, Vladimir (203 Czech Republic), Jan MATOUS (203 Czech Republic), Radan KEIL (203 Czech Republic), Milan DASTYCH (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Zdena ZADOROVA (203 Czech Republic), Michal VARGA (203 Czech Republic), Radek KROUPA (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Jiří DOLINA (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Miroslav MISUREC (203 Czech Republic), Aleš HEP (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Martin GRIVA (203 Czech Republic).
Edition DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018, 1590-8658.
Other information
Original language English
Type of outcome Article in a journal
Field of Study 30219 Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of publisher United States of America
Confidentiality degree is not subject to a state or trade secret
Impact factor Impact factor: 3.037
RIV identification code RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104089
Organization unit Faculty of Medicine
Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2017.10.010
UT WoS 000428631100009
Keywords in English Ascorbic acid; Bowel preparation; Colonoscopy; Polyethylene glycol; Sodium picosulfate
Tags 14110213, rivok
Tags International impact, Reviewed
Changed by Changed by: Soňa Böhmová, učo 232884. Changed: 11/2/2019 14:15.
Abstract
Background & aims: The optimal duration of bowel preparation has only been assessed for polyethylene glycol (PEG). The aim of the study was to determine the intervals for achieving a satisfactory quality/tolerability of the preparation using PEG/ascorbic acid (PEGA) and sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate (SPMC), and to compare them with 4L of PEG. Methods: A randomized, endoscopist-blinded, multicentre study. The 612 outpatients referred to a colonoscopy, were prepared using PEG, SPMC, PEGA. The quality, tolerability, duration of the preparation, and the interval from the end of the preparation to the colonoscopy was assessed. Results: Optimum duration of the preparation was similar for both PEG and SPMC (>= 7.3 vs. >= 8.8 h, overall >= 8.4 h). Optimum interval to the colonoscopy was <= 11.8 h and did not differ between preparations (PEG, PEGA <= 11.8, SPMC <= 13.3 h). These times were the only predictors for a satisfactory preparation. The tolerability depends on the product type (SPMC) only. Timing of the preparation or the other factors had no impact on tolerability. Conclusion: The optimum intervals for bowel preparation are identical for all preparations. Satisfactory preparation is achived at the preparation length >= 8.4 h and the time to colonoscopy <= 11.8 h.
PrintDisplayed: 29/7/2024 04:33