J 2018

BOMB PEAK: RADIOCARBON DATING OF SKELETAL REMAINS IN ROUTINE FORENSIC MEDICAL PRACTICE

HANDLOS, Petr, Ivo SVETLIK, Ladislava HORÁČKOVÁ, Michal FEJGL, Lukas KOTIK et. al.

Basic information

Original name

BOMB PEAK: RADIOCARBON DATING OF SKELETAL REMAINS IN ROUTINE FORENSIC MEDICAL PRACTICE

Authors

HANDLOS, Petr (203 Czech Republic), Ivo SVETLIK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Ladislava HORÁČKOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution), Michal FEJGL (203 Czech Republic), Lukas KOTIK (203 Czech Republic), Veronika BRYCHOVA (203 Czech Republic), Natalia MEGISOVA (203 Czech Republic) and Klara MARECOVA (203 Czech Republic)

Edition

RADIOCARBON, TUCSON, UNIV ARIZONA DEPT GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 0033-8222

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

30106 Anatomy and morphology

Country of publisher

United States of America

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Impact factor

Impact factor: 1.531

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14110/18:00104161

Organization unit

Faculty of Medicine

UT WoS

000444237700002

Keywords in English

forensic medicine; radiocarbon bomb peak dating; skeletal remains

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 9/2/2019 21:08, Soňa Böhmová

Abstract

V originále

When human remains are found, apart from helping explain the cause of death and determining the extent of any injuries, forensic pathologists are usually requested to determine the identity of the deceased and how much time has elapsed since his death. In the Czech Republic, the criminal liability for murder is set to a statute of limitations of 20 years. In our pilot study, tissue samples of human remains from two decedents were radiocarbon (C-14) dated to estimate the date of death. In agreement with published literature, we have confirmed relatively short carbon turnover time in hair, nail, and bone fat. Therefore these samples are the most appropriate for determining date of death. Other samples, such as teeth (collagen and carbonate form) and collagen isolated from bone samples, which exhibit relatively long carbon turnover time, can be used to reduce ambiguity of dating results and to indicate some interfering influences. Given the possibility of processing multiple sample types, we also propose brief guidelines for comparing and interpreting the results of individual analyses.